borgerløn

et beløb på 10k til 12k udbetalt vil give en trickle-up effekt der kan ses som en form for indirekte erhvervs-støtte.

hvad koster jobcentre og alt det andet der bliver tvunget ned over hovedet på folk på overførsel? nedlæg hele molevitten og forklar folk at det er deres eget ansvar at få en uddannelse og skaffe sig det gode job.

den nemmeste måde at gøre det på er at indsætte et beløb på folks konto således at de har 12.000 at leve for den næste måned. vil du ikke have noget af staten så kan du "bare" sørge for at have mere på din konto.

gensidig forsørgerpligt forsvinder også. hvorfor skal man straffes for at flytte sammen?

det vil også have den effekt at man kan tage et deltidsarbejde og stadig have mindst 12.000 at leve for.

starter man en virksomhed eller tager en uddannelse er man også sikret. faktisk er der kun fordele ved at omlægge velfærssystemet til den her model... bortset fra at folk ikke udsættes for den latterlige kontrol de oplever nu.

jeg tror endda en bank gerne vil låne dig til et fedt 80" uhd med sorround sound. du kommer måske til at betale 50% i renter reelt men det er ikke det folk bliver sure over. de bliver sure over at få nej. alle ved at det er dyrt at være fattig. og folk glæder sig over lidt luksus i hverdagen.

og det er forbavsende let at føre ud i livet. let's face it! din bank ved ALTID hvad du har stående.

hvis banken suplerer op til 10-12k, tæller sammen og sender regningen til staten så er vi ude over en hel del overflødigt arbejde.

det skal selvfølgelig være muligt at have en almindelig opsparing der kan hæves efter # år og en pensions opsparing.

der vil så heller ikke være tillæg for noget som helst. er du handikappet kan du få det på recept hos lægen og lægen kan bevilge special-tilskud. det vil sige at du kan få din hjælper på recept.

ønsker man at motivere til bestemte udannelser kan man give tilskud til lærebøger, arbejdstøj osv.

som sagt. der er ikke tilskud til noget som helst. hverken boligsikring, psykolog eller tandlæge. specielt tandlæge kan være en dyr fornøjelse derfor skal der være mulighed for at spare op. en konto der "låses" til den slags bestemte formål bør ikke tælle i forhold til månedligt rådighedsbeløb.

det samme kan siges med hensyn til pensions-opsparing. det er forrykt at straffe mennesker for at tage ansvar for sig selv på noget plan. og det sker nu.

og når der er den form for låste konti (hvorfor begrænse til en per person) så polstrer man bankerne da de har en hel del ballast. og det er en god ballast for en bank at vide x måneder frem i tiden hvad de har at gøre godt med. det her er et kæmpe tilskud til den pulje.

sådan kan liberal socialistisk politik bruges til at sikre velfærd og bankerne :-)

med rådighedsbeløb mener jeg at det er det beløb du har at råde over hver måned som det absolut mindste.

selvkørende biler og den 4. industrielle revolution

her er et lille facebook indlæg til en artikel i altinget. syntes lige jeg ville lægge den her inden det bliver fucket op af uvidende ignoranter der er bange for fremtiden.

https://www.facebook.com/Altingetdk/posts/10155284498018187

det kan ikke betale sig på langt sigt at spilde flere penge på offentlig transport. den måde det fungerer på nu vil blive overhalet af muligheder i teknologi.

man kunne forestille sig et abbonnement og en app hvor man bestiller transport. vælger fra og til samt hvor mange passagerer. det er endda teknisk muligt at rygere kan bestille ryger biler der aldrig vil blive sendt ud til en ikke-ryger. det samme med dyr. ingen grund til at en hundeejer ikke kan køre en tur i skoven med Fido når man som allergiker kan vælge kun at køre allergi venligt. spørg parfume allergikere om det vil være at foretrække fremfor det helvede bussen kan være. derudover betales der per kørt kilometer.

det vil være så nemt og bekvemmeligt. og de selvkørende biler kan lige så godt hente en hvor man er i stedet for busstoppesteder og tog stationer.

***

jeg fik dette svar: Jamen så sæt igang md dit fatamorgana ? Indtil da skal folk ku komme frem og tilbage med folk mener ALLE

***

du ved godt at det jeg beskriver er på vej, ikke? google og apple arbejder på det (blandt andre) så det kommer.

hvad mener du med fatamorgana? er du socialdemokrat eller fra 3f siden du har den holdning? for de er da om nogen fattesvage når det drejer sig om den 4. industrielle revolution. de tror virkelig de kan løse udfordringerne ved at forbyde virkeligheden😂

hvis du virkelig ønskede at indgå i en konstruktiv dialog og gøre et reelt forsøg på at håndtere de omvæltninger, udfordringer og muligheder vi kommer til de næste 10 - 15 - 20 år så ville du arbejde for at staten investerede i den slags over tid. det kræver et skift. et stort et faktisk. til gengæld får vi plads når togstationer og busstoppesteder forsvinder.

der vil stadig være brug for tog til transport over større afstande og af gods men i byer og et lille land som Danmark er andet idioti.

det eneste der ikke er på plads det er selvkørende biler men de kommer hurtigere end vi tror. alt det andet kan lade sig gøre og sker allerede i forskellige grader.

en taxa kan godt finde dig via din mobils gps så det kan en selvkørende bil også.

og med hensyn til personlige krav (rygning, dyr, allergi osv) så er det faktisk nemt for en computer at holde styr på 1000 biler og hvad der tillades i den enkelte bil.

fordi du ikke kan forstå det betyder det ikke det er uforståeligt og fordi du ikke bryder dig om det er det ikke automatisk noget lort, vel?

Fuck overfladisk kommunikation og smalltalk!

til at starte med vil jeg lige fastslå at jeg er computer-junkie. har været med fra starten af, jep, 80’erne, c64, judas priest, hele lortet. jeg elsker de muligheder der er for at kommunikere i dag. man kan slå alt op uden at bruge timer på store og tykke leksika. man kan sende en besked verden rundt på sekunder. man kan komme i kontakt med folk fra fjerne lande. udveksle meninger og synspunkter og derved lære en masse om andre kulturer, andre mennesker, verden og sig selv.

men hvis ens engagement i egen mening ikke strækker sig til mere end at klikke “like” så er jeg ikke interreseret i at høre den. i min optik er det at sige “jeg er enig med dem der er enige med de andre”. det er et problem at debatten bliver mere overfladisk og ligegyldig. nogle mennesker mener det er så vigtigt for alle andre at høre at nu har de været ude at handle. det er de fleste af os hver dag. det rager mig en høstblomst om der er tomater på tilbud i super-brugsen. hvis en af mine venner bliver kunde nummer 1000000 i netto og vinder en måneds forbrug af netto varer syntes jeg det er en sjov historie og vil meget gerne vide det. men ellers, nej.

mit problem er at min adhd gør at min koncentration ryger hvis jeg får 3 − 4 sms’er på 5 minutter. det tager mig timer at komme i gang igen. nogle gange kommer jeg ikke i gang igen og hvorfor? fordi folk mener at jeg skal tvinges til at tage del i deres - undskyld udtrykket - lort. nogle gange har jeg haft lyst til at tage et billede af indholdet af toilettet efter mit første morgenbesøg og tilføje teksten: “se en flot bæ jeg har lavet her til morgen”.

jeg har prøvet at give igen med samme mønt og man får intet svar retur. derfor mener jeg at det er overfladiske ligegyldigheder. jeg har haft forsøgt at ignorere det, blandt andet ved at slukke telefonen, men så går det ud over min email (her er der så muligheden for at markere folks email-adresse som spam, heldigvis).

jeg har sågar været ude for folk der begynder at spørge mig om hvad det ene eller det andet stykke software koster. klokken 22 om aftenen. jeg svarede naturligvis forkert med vilje og fik den rigtige pris retur. altså var vedkommende udemærket i stand til at finde prisen selv. og spørger man ind til om folk eksempelvis skal til at lave musik på computeren er svaret “nej, jeg vil bare gerne vide hvad prisen er”.

når jeg vågner om morgenen så ligger der allerede 10 sms’er fra folk der absolut skal vide om jeg har sovet godt, hvad jeg skal have at spise, hvad jeg skal lave resten af året. hvordan er vejret. og når man ikke har svaret hurtigt nok så er det “hvorfor svarer du ikke? sover du”. ja, klokken er 3 minutter over 6. “svar nu, jeg er ensom”. nej, man er ikke ensom fordi man har været alene hele formiddagen. man er ikke ensom bare fordi man ikke har fået en sms de sidste 2 timer. man er ikke ensom fordi der ikke er nogen der klikker like på et billede af ens nye sko.

jeg vil meget gerne vide det hvis der sker noget ud over det sædvanlige. men hvor mange gange forventer folk at jeg gider kommentere billede nummer 5000 af deres kat der slikker sol i vindueskarmen. det hjælper jo ikke engang at lade være med at svare for så kommer det samme spørgsmål bare igen og igen og igen. ofte 3 −4 gange hurtigt efter hinanden. jeg syntes ikke det er sødt når et lille barn tigger om slik i netto (men kan udemærket sætte mig ind i hvorfor) og slet ikke når voksne mennesker tigger - ja, nærmest kræver - opmærksomhed på den påtrængende og anmassende måde (her er så ingen forståelse overhovedet).

og hvis man endelig så svarer ærligt på hvad man skal hele dagen - hvis man altså skal andet end lige ned at handle - så får man “ok”, “he he” eller “det vil jeg også gerne” tilbage. og så bliver den ellers sendt videre til alle andre. det handler nemlig ikke om at man gerne vil engagere sig i sine venner. det handler om at man vil have noget at fortælle videre. for man kommer jo ikke selv med noget med et reelt indhold. det er så vigtigt for nogle mennesker at alle ved hvad de laver: “se mig! jeg gør så mange spændende ting. jeg er så speciel og interessant. se hvad jeg lige har gjort.”

jeg bruger selv twitter som en mental brækspand nogle gange. og at der er nogen der syntes at det jeg skriver er pladder-filosofisk vrøvl, simpsons citater og mærkelige digte og ordspil, har jeg kun forståelse for. men problemet er ikke større end at man kan klikke “unflollow” og så er problemet løst. jeg skriver så heller ikke til folk: “hvorfor følger du mig ikke mere?”

jeg syntes da selv at der er mange spændende ting ved mig men det er ikke interessant for alle. at jeg hygger med computeren, metal-guitar og min ’isme betyder ikke at resten af verden syntes det er så frygteligt spændende at de må vide alt. jeg føler i hvert tilfælde ikke at det er så vedkommende at alle skal vide at nu har jeg lært en ny skala. og helt ærligt, hvad skal man tale om når man så er sammen?

hvor den sygelige trang at andre skal tvinges til at deltage i ens helt almindelige dagligdag kommer fra skal jeg nok afholde mig fra at kommentere, men jeg tænker mit. jeg forlanger ikke at alle skal stoppe med den overdrevne brug af overfladisk kommunikation. jeg beder bare om at jeg ikke skal være en del af det. hvorfor kan man ikke få lov til at vælge fra?

*** løsningen er: en mobil med flytilstand der kun slåes fra når man bruger den ;-)

internet and operative system security and anonymity for the paranoid

do you feel someones got to you on your computer? do you suspect a keylogger or some other form of surveillance tool disturbing your privacy?

first you need an installer image of your favourite os. install that and all the apps and tools you need on a usb stick (you can get them with enough capacity today), a sd card or portable harddrive with builtin powersupply (the smaller ones don't take up more space than a package of cigarettes) and always take it with you whereever you go!

the latter is mandatory because if your are under monitoring from some goverment agency they can easily conceal a camera in your home and get your pw's that way. i read that Snowden entered his pw's under the cover of a blanket so it's not that far fetched.

if you live alone like me have several computers and have one of them running multiple services on virtual machines to ensure that some traffic is generated at arbitrary times.

then you need a good vpn. set your router, not the individual machines (physical or virtual) to use that vpn. don't worry! you can always have your prefered workmachine use a proxy so that you get an ip that matches your country.

message to the dumb bastards in the goat fucker caliphat

do you really think i fall for something that naive? do you think i'm that desperate? come on! a mildly anatchistic middleaged british woman (could be interrested) dressing up like a fuckin' jawa from Star Wars!

i'm a tranny! i'm a guy who occationally dress up as a woman! and i like it! you throw people like me out from high places.

i may not be happy with the way things are done where i live now but at least i have the freedom to say and the opputunity to change things... to some extent.

did you really think i would participate in taking your hackers to the next level... even cyberwar?

do you think you will recruit any decent hacker by using an 80'ties punk rocker - that never were that good in the first place - as a posterwoman. i think you are getting desperate - really desperate. you want cyberwar... i'll fuckin' give it to you. try to get a network up and running. you will be found. you will be eradicated with digital fire.

you want my tactics? my skills? you ain't seen nothing yet. maybe i should offer my services to the nato cyber command and fuck you over bigtime. the Russians don't need my help in doing this.

this is what i propose take control of daesh accounts on social media and spam their followers with messages like:

- we're having great fun. bombs are dropping like rain and we're getting mutilated.

- you really die of smoking in our caliphate.

- i'm an old hag and the men would rather fuck a goat than me.

- my freedom is limited. can only walk the streets accompanied by my husband who is dead.

you get the picture.

fuck daesh and their medieval caliphate.

'nuff said, cheers

Helene

here's the link http://www.techworm.net/2015/09/the-punk-rocker-widow-from-uk-who-wants-to-run-isis-hackers.html

cyberunit - building an effective one

these are my thoughts (so far) on how to create an effective cyber-unit or hacker group:

*****************
*** cyberunit ***
*****************

authorities versus specialists
==============================

an authority has expert level knowledge on a specific topic, this can be but not limited to php, mysql, zap and so on.
a specialist is able to utilize any technique as a weapon (ie. for military use)

the authority-people handles long term strategy whereas the specialist people takes care of the tactical situations that may arise. 

overview of the unit
====================

to know who is best suited to a specific task record information on who has most knowledge of different areas, like php, zap, shell-scripts, etc.
who has the best skills (ie hands-on) with specific software.
what area would the member best like to strengthen and what agitates them doing.

tactical layer
==============

handles mission planning since this is recon, attack, recon, attack and so on they decide best path to cut down time consumed on decision making.

strategic layer
===============

handles long term campaigns, choosing overall targets and choosing which areas - new techniques, example - internal knowledge that should receive focus.

wolfpack tactic
===============

this should make the basis for an unit that employs wolfpack tactics. it is so easy (with shared info on shared "hack"-servers) to add new personnel to an ongoing mission. and since everyone is making their own decisions within mission paramaters this is a very effeective method of organization. furthermore one can always re-assign unit members so that the strongest unit is presented for each "project".
every single member of the wolfpack knows the other members strengths and weaknesses. this tactic utilizes the way wolfpacks hunt.

shark tactic
============

get the target to focus attention on a single point and then attack (more or less) at random imitating a group of sharks floating by and each ripping a piece out of the target.

burst-fire hacking
==================

using the terminal can be tedious (you have to type a lot) so use scripts, aliases, functions and environment variables. also use tabs to seperate different tasks. it's easier to remember TARGET_IP_PRIMARY and TARGET_IP_SECONDARY than which ip is which target.

tools of the trade
==================

the computer is the gun and software the little pieces of ammunition you load it with. the os is more like a toolbox. a "hack"-server is a good idea to have running. it runs the software utilized by the unit and one connects to the servers and use port#'s to select the piece of program used.

old school techniques
=====================

you don't need a classy piece of software to send an email from everyone to everyone (you need access to the targets inbox to read any reply) just a smtp-gate and telnet.

it is paramount that info on techniques and related knowledge is shared widely and freely within the group to make everyone stronger.

hivemind

How the internet was born. Chaos at work. Man’s first God was fire. But it was not enough that our tribe had fire. No, we had to take our neighbors fire too or destroy it. Seriously. Haven’t we evolved past that. I mean 150.000 years have passed and it’s just the same.

How it escaped from the nerds to the masses. When the Amiga came anybody could get that arcade feeling at home. When the internet became widely available an explosion hit our world. One that will echo through history. A global communications and information network was born. Now it’s a vast ever growing, ever changing virtual entity comprised of all human knowledge.

How we all created it. Everyone laid their bricks or brick. No matter the size of the contribution it still enriched the world wide web. And the internet is fueled by information flowing freely.

A very vice man once said: “Information wants to be free!”

Today I shout: “Information must be free!”

It solves problems. Not just communication or distribution of media. But truth – dictators do have a harder time manipulating and controlling people. Excessive monitoring is a problem though. We get to that later.

“In a world where information is the most priced possession any hacker is a god.” No. Not quite. Some are, but most are just a damned inconvenience.
Good or evil – a matter of conviction. Terrorists, fascists, hackers, criminals, freedoms fighters, cyber-soldiers. Just our world reaching out to the internet. Who cares about kilobytes in a terra-byte world? Anybody with a keen eye. Do not fear those motivated by money. They rip your account and they’re done. The dangerous ones are those that are driven. Idealists. Crusaders. A good hacker is someone who creates a tool for the specific job or modify existing tools to solve the mystery in sight. That, and simplicity in design. Last but most important: “Use the source, g33k” Anyway. A hacker is traditionally perceived as someone who has an urge to learn everything there is to learn about computer-networks. Some may be. I don’t know. Me, I’m not. I am an uncompromising  manipulating predator relying on stealth and deception. I do it, well, because I can. And it’s about the only thing I’m really good at. And I’m not super good at that either. I just love to create chaos and disorder. Disassemble the walls of society. Stick it to the world.

Piracy. The end of entertainment. No. There has been piracy from the second it was possible to duplicate someone else work. The tape recorder did not become the death of musicians or record companies. The VCR did not bring the fall of Hollywood. When tv became widely available doom prophets claimed it would kill the radio. Apparently it didn’t. But in reality if I take my acoustic guitar and start jamming in public. I’m just rockin’ out hard with “Hell bent for leather”. But if I did not get a written permission to do so I have become a criminal. Piracy do harm the industry but it has always been there. I have become more of a customer over the years due to better income and not always being at the front row of a concert. And I can download right now. Today I usually check out an “internet edition” and the ones I keep I mostly end up buying. Movies, I have a lot. But most of my collection are series from the 80’es and 90’es. And all the new ones I have seen in a cinema. And there is only one way to download most of what I like. Last one downloaded was “Shogun” from 1980. Last “larger” expense was “Diablo 3”. What a rip-off! Blizzard, that was not nice. But to be fair, I did wait from like 2007 for this game so no matter what it could not meet my expectations. Actually. All the things I have done in my life, the things in which I take great pride were never my own. I did not invent a single thing. I merely adapted others work to fit my world. But I did create an alternative. I broadened our world in a very small manner. And I think that that is humans defining attribute. That ability has lead us to this very moment. And it will long after we are gone and all this is but nothing in eternity. Why monopolize it?

If patents had been around when the first shovel came to existence 1 person would sit in a hole protecting the tool and anybody else would look for the functionality of a shovel just as long as it doesn’t appear to be one.

Social media. the newest product? But if we think we are the customer we are wrong. We produce the product. All those intimate details we share, that is the product. You can’t force someone to shut up and you can’t force someone to listen. But that, we all share. That’s the true value of the internet. Here we meet as equals because we meet on the same basis. Same opportunities. It’s quite simple. We deserve equal rights and opportunities. But we are not equal as in a mathematical equation. Some are strong. Some are not. Some are smart. Some are not. Some are hot. Some are not. Some are women. Some are not. Some are men. Some are not. We are not the same. We just have similar designs. We are like a trillion different versions of the same old buggy code.

Innovation? If the only new thing about it is in the form of we haven’t seen you in that dress before, then, who cares. If it has no real value but that of being only for a select few why even care. Does it concern me. No. It does not! So why the fuck do I have to read about it in adds? And they can bill me for my dreams.

Networking. The next big religion. Well. I know God or any God is not in the computer. But the teachings of any religion is very much present on the internet. People connect, share across borders, politics, religion, sex. Here we find understanding, tolerance and acceptance. Groups show you that you are not alone. You are not the only one struck by a terrible curse or having brilliant ideas. You are just a human. No more no less. We perceive the world through the internet. I prefer the written word. I like to construct sentences and see meaning come to life. Also because I have ADHD I can be pretty fired-up about something and that kills the meaning of what I want to say. It’s like counting the bullets from a stuck Gatling-gun.

Commercialization. Assimilation is not integration. Why do we choose the internet over tv as entertainment? Because it is real? Until money becomes the issue? Will it suffer the same fate as cinema, radio, tv? Ending up another pass-time experience? No it won’t. The underground is present on the internet and will always be so. It’s all about alternatives and if you are the only option it’s not really freedom of choice, is it? There will always be some tech-anarchist saying: we don’t want to be a part of that. And some of these people would rather give away their most brilliant ideas for free to benefit the masses. Not just some corporate board members pockets. But these people won’t run adds on prime time tv. You have to look for it. There’s freedom of choice for you. Free means it’s there. It’s available. It’s just not something you’ll find in stores. All human information is there. And it should be. And it should be widely available.

Excessive monitoring and logging. The death of the internet? No, I do not believe that. There will always be ways to hide your identity and traffic. I don’t think we should worry about all that information the governments and intelligence services of the world has stored and analysed. At least we shouldn’t fear what it could be abused for. Science fiction does that job very well. We should worry what it is actually used for. Because every time the subject comes up those with knowledge of what is happening say: “I can’t go into that.” Or they simply say nothing. I think it’s funny that when someone mentions the idea of investigating, say the financial sector, the medical sector, whatever, these sectors always come back with an answer saying we’ve already looked into it, there’s nothing to raise an eyebrow over. But when the talk falls on vpns, encryption, darknets, the like my defense is mandatory all of a sudden. And I say: yeah, I use encrypted connections. I even try to push my non-geekie friends to at least encrypt their mails and use a proxy when getting not-supposed-to-be-free stuff. So, yeah. It’s only the true innocent who doesn’t have a problem with somebody looking over their shoulder. Innocence is something we grow out off. Sadly.

CyberWar? Well. We do know a lot about methods, strategies, software because this is a very public war. We are all wired into the battlefield. We see the results all over the world. Only one way not to get fucked hard in the a-hole: be open of your methods and tools. Don’t reveal specific details. But always bare in mind that everything that must not get out in the open always end up being out in the open and then it is just to late to deny or cover it up. Damage done. Your opponent dealt you a devastating blow. In reality CyberWar is won or lost by the support of your people. When you loose your way and start thinking inwards for protection your own people become the enemy and then you have lost all. But really: This is one of those things I personally think should be considered one of life’s great lessons: “If it’s on a computer, eventually, it will get loose.” You want privacy and safety? Two words “Go offline”. But with the public very much aware the pursuit of pre-empetive retaliation is not worth the thinking. As stated earlier it’s a public war. And if you are righteous – on the side of good – you must put great distance between you and your foe. You can’t say we are the good guys and then do something far worse than your opponent. Lie! Deny your people the truth. Feed them shit that keep them aggravated against some unseen force. If you become the very same thing you wowed to destroy you have lost. Personally I would love to go back to ancient times in questions of war. When armies met on some distant battlefield. When generals lead the battle on the field. Then politicians could have their profitable wars. And those who would could seek out honor and fame. And the rest of us would just have peace.

Threats lurking: big data – and by big we are talking beyond comprehension, we’re talking more drives than I can fit in my shoe closet. Backup is not possible for these systems. The amounts of data are too large. The complexity to vast. And there is not a source-tree that get you back all that data stockpiling over the years. And data is money. I mean erasing it would accomplish nothing more than aggravating ones peers. But to manipulate it that is the key. Example: I don’t like my bank. I write a virus (actually a dbms-trigger) that alters updates in the database so that at a glance everything checks out but when the annual books are reviewed all hell is loose. Not good for a bank to deliver the annual report with notes. It could be a good tactic to annoy intelligence services data retention too. Poison13 would be a good name, I think.

cloud-computing: all your personal info in the hands of a private cut-throat corp. nice. i don't mind that some company knows what i'm buying for dinner because i use an reminder on a cell. but when they start to harvest that data to sell to add-companies to spam me i think it's too much.

Always near. With tablets killing off the remnants of the old way of thinking computers you have your board with you. When you get home it connects to your wireless keyboard, tv or tvs, stereo or whatever. I don’t know about you but I can’t wait! Wireless audio and no fans or static chip-noise to make the slightest impact on the sound… Not that I would actually be able to hear it since I mostly play Metal on a Marshall 100w tube-amp on 11.

But how did it all start for me? Well, it started when I fell in love with computer games. I had this urge to cheat so I learned assembler, debuggers. My first steps as a hacker was taken.

But I think that future generations will see themselves as inhabitants of a planet due the nature of the Internet. I think world-parties will arise. It already have with “Pirate Party”. Maybe one day we will begin to see ourselves as unique individuals in a collective with our slogan being:

one planet
one world
one people

“Don’t explain the logic. Share the dream, your vision. Let me discover it’s wisdom on my own. That’s where the magic’s at. In comparison, the rest is merely tedious details.”

I got the inspiration for this book partly by the media sector’s – lead by record- and movie- companies – relentless efforts to control how we use media. Also Al-Jazeera’s “Controlling the web” gave some inspiration. So did videos and tweets posted by individuals and groups. They be commentators for tech magazines. They be hacktivists.

I won’t make any links or references to anything. If you disagree or don’t believe me look it up yourself. Don’t rely on my word or my sources. Find your own. That is what the Internet is there for.

This is not a hint. This is an open comment on the affairs of the world today. It is my way of saying that I am tired of politicians caring more for corporate profit than the rights of the people they serve.

Any actual or insinuated name references or reference to any one person, group of persons or any brand is purely intentional and deliberate. so if you don’t like me calling you greedy, self-righteous (like me), ignorant, whining (again like me) or arrogant…  Well, we are. And we’re dicks!

If this pisses you off write a book. I did…

*** and by "book" i mean a written text larger than one page :-)