tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-77323038932181469552024-02-20T11:55:36.491+01:00How did this s**t happen - or to be more polite - how did I happen?My view on the world and it's affairs.Miss Helenehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17048419673729977248noreply@blogger.comBlogger17125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7732303893218146955.post-81468379746848332472018-07-14T12:37:00.002+02:002018-07-14T12:37:56.625+02:00Afrika PlanAfrika Plan<br />
-----------<br />
<br />
strategisk:<br />
<br />
det handler om stoppe strømmen af migranter der aldrig vil have en chance for at få ophold.<br />
<br />
taktisk:<br />
de tager afsted fordi de ganske enkelt ikke har nogle muligheder.<br />
de er ikke forfulgte. eller i fare. de kan bare ikke få en uddannelse og derefter job.<br />
derfor er det der der skal sættes ind.<br />
<br />
operationelt:<br />
når de møder op i Danmark og søger asyl (det er det der skal flyttes til uddannelsescentereret eller et modtagecenter) så screenes de. kan de få asyl ryger de videre i til det system. kan de ikke får de tilbud om uddannelse og hjælp til opstart af virksomhed i hjemlandet. denne aftale kræver at de skriver under på at de ikke er forfulgte i hjemlandet. derfor vil det også være nemmere at sende dem hjem igen.<br />
<br />
udgifter til uddannelse kan tages fra ulandsbistand og hjælp til opstart kan erhvervslivet/private tage sig af. hvordan? arabiske lån. den unge låner et beløb der dog udbetales i rater, blandt andet for at modvirke snyd og plyndring af den unge når de kommer tilbage. der udbetales måske 95% af beløbet, det vil sige at de der støtter tjener 5%. om nogle vil oprette en ngo der giver de lån gratis via crowdfunding eller lignende er også en mulighed.<br />
<br />
jeg forstår godt at en nyuddannet ingeniør hellere vil blive i Danmark og arbejde og det er surt for os hvis vedkommende er dygtig men forholdende i Afrika er som de er blandt andet fordi de derkan, bliver hvor de kommer frem i stedet for at tage tilbage og skabe værdier der.<br />
<br />
den nærmeste ambassade tager sig af det lavpraktiske.<br />
<br />
* <i>det her er lidt løst. der kommer en mere udførlig i løbet af de næste par uger ;)</i>Miss Helenehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17048419673729977248noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7732303893218146955.post-34574852323779960792018-03-23T13:45:00.004+01:002018-03-23T13:45:52.791+01:00DR og licens - friheden til at vælge fra<div style="background-color: white; color: #4c4c4c; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Arial, Helvetica, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
det er ikke så meget det at licensen nu skal trækkes over skatten. jeg synes det er urimeligt at man tvinges til at finansiere underholdning som ligegyldige sangprogrammer, kagekonkurrencer og nogle der gætter på hvor meget et eller andet er værd. det er overfladisk underholdning uden nogen videre samfundsmæssig relevans. med andre ord: det er ikke public service.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #4c4c4c; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Arial, Helvetica, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
ville du synes det er rimeligt du betaler til min underholdning? DR burde splittes op i en public service del der tager sig af oplysning om samfundsrelevante emner, nyheder og lignende, og så en underholdningsdel der tager sig af det samme som de kommercielle kanaler. DR har jo netop fået licens fordi de ikke skulle konkurrere på seertal eller andet.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #4c4c4c; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Arial, Helvetica, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
jeg vil gerne betale til de helt basale public service ydelser men ikke alt det overfladiske pop og bras de ellers sender. vi har alle forskellige præferencer for at slappe af, nogle ser X Factor og andre spiller Deus Ex. vi taler ikke om noget der egentlig er livsnødvendigt, men helt sikkert for den der nu nyder det, er det fede ting. men vi skal ikke til at betale for at underholde hinanden. det må den enkelte selv beslutte. jeg vil hellere bruge penge på en cd eller et nyt spil. hvad du foretrækker af underholdning er helt din sag og det vil jeg aldrig blande mig i.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #4c4c4c; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Arial, Helvetica, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
DR's serier er pænt uinteressante for mig. jeg foretrækker dem der ligger på Netflix. HBO har også et par gode men ikke nok til at jeg vil betale for det. hvorfor kan jeg ikke få samme frihed når det drejer sig om DR?</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #4c4c4c; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Arial, Helvetica, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
det giver lige så meget mening at jeg skal være med til at finansiere at folk kan se Tour de France som at naboen skal betale for mit Netflix.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #4c4c4c; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Arial, Helvetica, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
det der i virkeligheden har manglet er en debat om hvad public service egentlig skal dække over. nyheder, oplysning og kultur, den dur. underholdning og sport (som også er underholdning) og uendelige genudsendelser af serier (som jeg i høj grad benytter mig af ved streaming)... hvis jeg ønsker det så kan jeg vælge at finde de kanaler der har et udbud der falder i min smag.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #4c4c4c; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Arial, Helvetica, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
der mangler en debat om hvad DR's kerneområde egentlig skal være. hvor skal DR afgrænses således at hvis de ønsker at gå ind i de områder så må de konkurrere på lige vilkår med de kommercielle. og så er vi tilbage til at de selv må stå for at finansiere de programmer. public service delen vil jo stadig være med til at betale for medarbejdere og bygninger så de har jo stadig en konkurrence fordel på den måde.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #4c4c4c; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Arial, Helvetica, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
man kunne forestille sig at man kunne vælge underholdnings-delen fra. det kan laves enkelt hvis DR etablerer logon med nem-id. har man det får man den udvidede adgang. alle har adgang til public service udbudet. det kan alle andre finde ud af at lave. ellers må de betale sig fra det. de der fravælger får et skattefradrag. og det er nemt at finde ud af om folk nu er berettigede til fradraget, har de aktiveret dr underholdning er de ikke. så enkelt kan det gøres men vores liberale regering ønsker ikke at give os borgere frihed til selv at vælge og slet ikke friheden til at vælge fra.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #4c4c4c; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Arial, Helvetica, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #4c4c4c; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Arial, Helvetica, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
* skrevet her første gang (mutated) <a href="https://ekstrabladet.dk/nyheder/politik/danskpolitik/licenskrig-kristian-jensen-haelder-joachim-b-ned-ad-braettet/7090771" target="_blank">Ekstrabladet: licenskrig - Kristian Jensen hælder Joachim B. ned</a><span id="goog_1958817665"></span><a href="https://www.blogger.com/"></a><span id="goog_1958817666"></span></div>
Miss Helenehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17048419673729977248noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7732303893218146955.post-32108955115708579012017-10-24T14:38:00.001+02:002017-10-24T14:38:35.677+02:00privatisering, frihed og mad til ungerne i institutioner<p dir="ltr">hvad med at benytte private underleverandører? forældrene kan lave ungernes menu for en uge eller måned ad gangen. på den måde kan forældrene sikre at ungerne spiser det "rigtige", halal, veganer eller saftige burgere med det hele.</p>
<p dir="ltr">ungerne kan jo være med derhjemme til at vælge så de får noget de kan lide og så vil de heller ikke brokke sig over at de andre spiser noget andet. det er også en god måde at lære poderne at vi er forskellige på.</p>
<p dir="ltr">der er 2 problemer umiddelbart. økonomi, som burde kunne lade sig gøre hvis flere institutioner eller kommuner går sammen. og så er der snakken om kvalitet hvor tilsyn er, først institutionens (de ser jo maden dagligt) ansvar og dernæst kommunens (de har det overordnede ansvar).</p>
<p dir="ltr">men lad os hellere vælge tvang og forbud.</p>
<p dir="ltr">den enkelte institution har en liste over leverandører i området og derfra kan forældrene frit sammensætte menu.</p>
<p dir="ltr">når maden ankommer har personalet en liste de fordeler maden efter.</p>
<p dir="ltr">betaling? enlige på kontanthjælp (eksempelvis) kan for eksempel få et tilskud eller hel dækning alt efter økonomi.</p>
<p dir="ltr">de der har ressourcerne må til lommerne selv.</p>
<p dir="ltr">jeg ved godt at det betyder at nogle børn vil forbruge en højere del af budgettet end andre men er det vigtige at ungerne får hvad de ønsker udfra forældrenes præferencer eller at alle får lige lidt?</p>
<p dir="ltr">og da institution og kommune udvælger (og godkender) leverandører så burde sundhed og lignende være dækket.</p>
<p dir="ltr">på den måde kan Mohammed få kebab og Mogens flæskestegs-sandwich... og hvis forældrene syntes det er ok kan det omvendte også lade sig gøre.</p>
Miss Helenehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17048419673729977248noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7732303893218146955.post-70999587816482063892017-06-22T10:10:00.000+02:002017-06-22T10:10:45.516+02:00frihandelsaftaler<div>
we do need a new world order. one that takes into account the worries of ordinairy people who just want to get up in the morning, go to work to support their families and give something better than what they had to their kids. the west with the stinking eu has failed miserably on that subject. epic! i believe that BRICS could and should take charge, show responibility and leadership. western leaders only worry what they can gain and if they get nothing (even when they've worked against any good idea) those ideas won't be put to good use.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
handel er egentlig bare: det her tilbyder vi. hvad tilbyder i? jeg kan godt se det virkelig er kompliceret. det bliver det når frihandelsaftaler går over sine bredder og omfatter mere end handel. her behøver man ikke forholde sig til mere end nødvendigt. det kan være at et emne man er rørende uenige om over tid bliver mere medgørligt, måske grundet ny teknologi, men det vil ikke forsinke hele processen.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
der er en enklere måde at gøre det på. men umuligt at overskue for et menneske. i stedet for store handelsaftaler der forsøger at håndtere alt skal man bruge mange små. fysiske varer eller services kommer ud på et. man kan så have google for (fri)handelsaftaler og det vil være let at overskue. små aftaler vil også (forhåbentlig) være lettere og hurtigere at forhandle på plads. præcis derfor skal de barberes ned. energi for sig. grøntsager for sig (herunder gmo). det gør det også nemmere at rette op på uhensigsmæssige aftaler. produkt eller produkt gruppe. det behøver ikke være mere detaljeret end nødvendigt.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
på denne her måde kan et land (eller gruppe af lande) tilslutte sig de aftaler de ønsker. jeg tænker nok mere globalt end det fremstår. og eu's indre marked handler om langt mere end simpel handel.</div>
<div>
det er heler ikke det jeg argumenterer for. jeg argumenterer for at 2 (minimum for at lave en aftale) eller flere lande (også i sammenslutning f.eks. 5 mod 2) laver en handels aftale. andre lande kan så tilslutte sig hvis de ønsker. ingen tvang. det er da ikke kompliceret men pænt uoverskueligt. det er også derfor en google for handels-aftaler er påkrævet. vil du vide hvordan det ser ud med maling søger du på det og så får du alle de aftaler der vedrører maling. du kan begrænse søgningen til de aftaler dit eget land har tilsluttet sig.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
der kan være en aftale for fødevarer med gmo (kan sagtens indeholde fødevarer uden gmo også) og en uden, med hver deres fordele og ulemper. så kan de enkelte lande vælge hvilken aftale de vil tilslutte sig. faktisk kan et land tilslutte sig begge hvis der ikke er noget i aftalerne der forhindrer andet. det er blot et eksempel men jeg kan godt se i ikke kan lide frihed og nægter at svare på hvor det rimelige i at Danmark for eksempel kan "tvinges" til at acceptere varer der ikke lever op til de krav vi har nu, for eksempel Amerikanske klor-kyllinger.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
hvorfor skal et land tvinges til at acceptere gmo fordi det forsøges sneget ind ad bagvejen gennem "frihandelsaftaler"? hvorfor skal arbejdstager-rettigheder forringes i et ræs mod bunden? bare fordi vi alle kan have fordele af bestemte aftaler behøver vi ikke sidde på skødet af hinanden. bare se på eu's historie hvordan det er gået langt ud over det oprindelige. det er fascisme omend en blød en af slagsen. du kan starte med at forklare mig det rimelige i at man fratages suverænitet bare fordi man ønsker at udveksle varer og tjenesteydelser.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
men det er ikke en model der vil vinde indpas i eu som det kører nu. men BRIKS landene mangler stadig at lave en kæmpe aftale. jeg syntes de skulle lave en masse små. så kan du tilslutte dig det du ønsker og ellers prøve at forhandle en ny aftale hvis andre vil være med. som du sikkert har gættet vil jeg meget gerne holde det ude af nuværende organisationer som eu, fn, wto, whatever for der vil være for mange særinteresser at tage højde for.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
det eu kalder frihandelsaftaler handler langt mere om harmonisering (ensretning). også kultur. du skal tvinges til at have eu's holdning. det ses tydeligst når der stemmes imod mere eu - modstanderne er dumme og uvidende.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
det system her gør op med den slags da det vil blive kørt ud på et sidespor og man kan koncentrere sig om det vi rent faktisk kan blive enige om. efter min overbevisning bør vi samarbejde hvor vi kan. der er ingen grund til at tvinge lande til at acceptere at afgive suverænitet på punkter de helst ønsker holdt nationalt.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
jeg vil have frihandel der er fri. og det er ikke det der foregår nu. det handler om meget mere end handel.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
jeg taler om mange parallelle aftaler der sagtens kan omhandle samme kategorier i forskellige grader. google for handelsaftaler kan sagtens holde styr på det. så har du frihed til at vælge og du behøver ikke gå videre end du ønsker. med du mener jeg land eller sammenslutning.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
hvis een stor handelsaftale fungerer hvorfor vil mange små så ikke?</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<a href="https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10156193738927646&id=66328502645xx" target="_blank">https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10156193738927646&id=66328502645xx</a></div>
Miss Helenehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17048419673729977248noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7732303893218146955.post-40743606744655855392017-06-20T00:01:00.003+02:002017-06-20T00:01:34.593+02:00borgerløn<span style="background-color: white; color: #4c4c4c; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Arial, Helvetica, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">et beløb på 10k til 12k udbetalt vil give en trickle-up effekt der kan ses som en form for indirekte erhvervs-støtte.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #4c4c4c; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Arial, Helvetica, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><br /></span>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #4c4c4c; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Arial, Helvetica, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
<span style="box-sizing: border-box;">hvad koster jobcentre og alt det andet der bliver tvunget ned over hovedet på folk på overførsel? nedlæg hele molevitten og forklar folk at det er deres eget ansvar at få en uddannelse og skaffe sig det gode job.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #4c4c4c; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Arial, Helvetica, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
<span style="box-sizing: border-box;">den nemmeste måde at gøre det på er at indsætte et beløb på folks konto således at de har 12.000 at leve for den næste måned. vil du ikke have noget af staten så kan du "bare" sørge for at have mere på din konto.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #4c4c4c; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Arial, Helvetica, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
gensidig forsørgerpligt forsvinder også. hvorfor skal man straffes for at flytte sammen?</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #4c4c4c; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Arial, Helvetica, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
det vil også have den effekt at man kan tage et deltidsarbejde og stadig have mindst 12.000 at leve for.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #4c4c4c; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Arial, Helvetica, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
starter man en virksomhed eller tager en uddannelse er man også sikret. faktisk er der kun fordele ved at omlægge velfærssystemet til den her model... bortset fra at folk ikke udsættes for den latterlige kontrol de oplever nu.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #4c4c4c; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Arial, Helvetica, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
jeg tror endda en bank gerne vil låne dig til et fedt 80" uhd med sorround sound. du kommer måske til at betale 50% i renter reelt men det er ikke det folk bliver sure over. de bliver sure over at få nej. alle ved at det er dyrt at være fattig. og folk glæder sig over lidt luksus i hverdagen.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #4c4c4c; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Arial, Helvetica, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
<span style="box-sizing: border-box;">og det er forbavsende let at føre ud i livet. let's face it! din bank ved ALTID hvad du har stående.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #4c4c4c; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Arial, Helvetica, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
hvis banken suplerer op til 10-12k, tæller sammen og sender regningen til staten så er vi ude over en hel del overflødigt arbejde.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #4c4c4c; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Arial, Helvetica, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
det skal selvfølgelig være muligt at have en almindelig opsparing der kan hæves efter # år og en pensions opsparing.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #4c4c4c; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Arial, Helvetica, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
der vil så heller ikke være tillæg for noget som helst. er du handikappet kan du få det på recept hos lægen og lægen kan bevilge special-tilskud. det vil sige at du kan få din hjælper på recept.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #4c4c4c; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Arial, Helvetica, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
ønsker man at motivere til bestemte udannelser kan man give tilskud til lærebøger, arbejdstøj osv.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #4c4c4c; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Arial, Helvetica, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
<span style="box-sizing: border-box;">som sagt. der er ikke tilskud til noget som helst. hverken boligsikring, psykolog eller tandlæge. specielt tandlæge kan være en dyr fornøjelse derfor skal der være mulighed for at spare op. en konto der "låses" til den slags bestemte formål bør ikke tælle i forhold til månedligt rådighedsbeløb.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #4c4c4c; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Arial, Helvetica, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
<span style="box-sizing: border-box;">det samme kan siges med hensyn til pensions-opsparing. det er forrykt at straffe mennesker for at tage ansvar for sig selv på noget plan. og det sker nu.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #4c4c4c; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Arial, Helvetica, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
<span style="box-sizing: border-box;">og når der er den form for låste konti (hvorfor begrænse til en per person) så polstrer man bankerne da de har en hel del ballast. og det er en god ballast for en bank at vide x måneder frem i tiden hvad de har at gøre godt med. det her er et kæmpe tilskud til den pulje.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #4c4c4c; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Arial, Helvetica, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
<span style="box-sizing: border-box;"></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #4c4c4c; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Arial, Helvetica, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
sådan kan liberal socialistisk politik bruges til at sikre velfærd og bankerne :-)</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #4c4c4c; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Arial, Helvetica, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px; word-wrap: break-word;">
med rådighedsbeløb mener jeg at det er det beløb du har at råde over hver måned som det absolut mindste.</div>
Miss Helenehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17048419673729977248noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7732303893218146955.post-39167010079284122312017-05-27T14:53:00.002+02:002017-05-27T14:53:58.637+02:00selvkørende biler og den 4. industrielle revolutionher er et lille facebook indlæg til en artikel i altinget. syntes lige jeg ville lægge den her inden det bliver fucket op af uvidende ignoranter der er bange for fremtiden.<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<div>
https://www.facebook.com/Altingetdk/posts/10155284498018187</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
det kan ikke betale sig på langt sigt at spilde flere penge på offentlig transport. den måde det fungerer på nu vil blive overhalet af muligheder i teknologi.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
man kunne forestille sig et abbonnement og en app hvor man bestiller transport. vælger fra og til samt hvor mange passagerer. det er endda teknisk muligt at rygere kan bestille ryger biler der aldrig vil blive sendt ud til en ikke-ryger. det samme med dyr. ingen grund til at en hundeejer ikke kan køre en tur i skoven med Fido når man som allergiker kan vælge kun at køre allergi venligt. spørg parfume allergikere om det vil være at foretrække fremfor det helvede bussen kan være. derudover betales der per kørt kilometer.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
det vil være så nemt og bekvemmeligt. og de selvkørende biler kan lige så godt hente en hvor man er i stedet for busstoppesteder og tog stationer.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
***</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
jeg fik dette svar: Jamen så sæt igang md dit fatamorgana ? Indtil da skal folk ku komme frem og tilbage med folk mener ALLE</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
***</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
du ved godt at det jeg beskriver er på vej, ikke? google og apple arbejder på det (blandt andre) så det kommer.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
hvad mener du med fatamorgana? er du socialdemokrat eller fra 3f siden du har den holdning? for de er da om nogen fattesvage når det drejer sig om den 4. industrielle revolution. de tror virkelig de kan løse udfordringerne ved at forbyde virkeligheden😂</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
hvis du virkelig ønskede at indgå i en konstruktiv dialog og gøre et reelt forsøg på at håndtere de omvæltninger, udfordringer og muligheder vi kommer til de næste 10 - 15 - 20 år så ville du arbejde for at staten investerede i den slags over tid. det kræver et skift. et stort et faktisk. til gengæld får vi plads når togstationer og busstoppesteder forsvinder.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
der vil stadig være brug for tog til transport over større afstande og af gods men i byer og et lille land som Danmark er andet idioti.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
det eneste der ikke er på plads det er selvkørende biler men de kommer hurtigere end vi tror. alt det andet kan lade sig gøre og sker allerede i forskellige grader.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
en taxa kan godt finde dig via din mobils gps så det kan en selvkørende bil også.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
og med hensyn til personlige krav (rygning, dyr, allergi osv) så er det faktisk nemt for en computer at holde styr på 1000 biler og hvad der tillades i den enkelte bil.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
fordi du ikke kan forstå det betyder det ikke det er uforståeligt og fordi du ikke bryder dig om det er det ikke automatisk noget lort, vel?</div>
</div>
Miss Helenehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17048419673729977248noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7732303893218146955.post-85254254234101502772017-01-17T08:19:00.003+01:002017-01-17T09:04:45.841+01:00Fuck overfladisk kommunikation og smalltalk!til at starte med vil jeg lige fastslå at jeg er computer-junkie. har været med fra starten af, jep, 80’erne, c64, judas priest, hele lortet. jeg elsker de muligheder der er for at kommunikere i dag. man kan slå alt op uden at bruge timer på store og tykke leksika. man kan sende en besked verden rundt på sekunder. man kan komme i kontakt med folk fra fjerne lande. udveksle meninger og synspunkter og derved lære en masse om andre kulturer, andre mennesker, verden og sig selv.<br />
<br />
men hvis ens engagement i egen mening ikke strækker sig til mere end at klikke “like” så er jeg ikke interreseret i at høre den. i min optik er det at sige “jeg er enig med dem der er enige med de andre”. det er et problem at debatten bliver mere overfladisk og ligegyldig. nogle mennesker mener det er så vigtigt for alle andre at høre at nu har de været ude at handle. det er de fleste af os hver dag. det rager mig en høstblomst om der er tomater på tilbud i super-brugsen. hvis en af mine venner bliver kunde nummer 1000000 i netto og vinder en måneds forbrug af netto varer syntes jeg det er en sjov historie og vil meget gerne vide det. men ellers, nej.<br />
<br />
mit problem er at min adhd gør at min koncentration ryger hvis jeg får 3 − 4 sms’er på 5 minutter. det tager mig timer at komme i gang igen. nogle gange kommer jeg ikke i gang igen og hvorfor? fordi folk mener at jeg skal tvinges til at tage del i deres - undskyld udtrykket - lort. nogle gange har jeg haft lyst til at tage et billede af indholdet af toilettet efter mit første morgenbesøg og tilføje teksten: “se en flot bæ jeg har lavet her til morgen”.<br />
<br />
jeg har prøvet at give igen med samme mønt og man får intet svar retur. derfor mener jeg at det er overfladiske ligegyldigheder. jeg har haft forsøgt at ignorere det, blandt andet ved at slukke telefonen, men så går det ud over min email (her er der så muligheden for at markere folks email-adresse som spam, heldigvis).<br />
<br />
jeg har sågar været ude for folk der begynder at spørge mig om hvad det ene eller det andet stykke software koster. klokken 22 om aftenen. jeg svarede naturligvis forkert med vilje og fik den rigtige pris retur. altså var vedkommende udemærket i stand til at finde prisen selv. og spørger man ind til om folk eksempelvis skal til at lave musik på computeren er svaret “nej, jeg vil bare gerne vide hvad prisen er”.<br />
<br />
når jeg vågner om morgenen så ligger der allerede 10 sms’er fra folk der absolut skal vide om jeg har sovet godt, hvad jeg skal have at spise, hvad jeg skal lave resten af året. hvordan er vejret. og når man ikke har svaret hurtigt nok så er det “hvorfor svarer du ikke? sover du”. ja, klokken er 3 minutter over 6. “svar nu, jeg er ensom”. nej, man er ikke ensom fordi man har været alene hele formiddagen. man er ikke ensom bare fordi man ikke har fået en sms de sidste 2 timer. man er ikke ensom fordi der ikke er nogen der klikker like på et billede af ens nye sko.<br />
<br />
jeg vil meget gerne vide det hvis der sker noget ud over det sædvanlige. men hvor mange gange forventer folk at jeg gider kommentere billede nummer 5000 af deres kat der slikker sol i vindueskarmen. det hjælper jo ikke engang at lade være med at svare for så kommer det samme spørgsmål bare igen og igen og igen. ofte 3 −4 gange hurtigt efter hinanden. jeg syntes ikke det er sødt når et lille barn tigger om slik i netto (men kan udemærket sætte mig ind i hvorfor) og slet ikke når voksne mennesker tigger - ja, nærmest kræver - opmærksomhed på den påtrængende og anmassende måde (her er så ingen forståelse overhovedet).<br />
<br />
og hvis man endelig så svarer ærligt på hvad man skal hele dagen - hvis man altså skal andet end lige ned at handle - så får man “ok”, “he he” eller “det vil jeg også gerne” tilbage. og så bliver den ellers sendt videre til alle andre. det handler nemlig ikke om at man gerne vil engagere sig i sine venner. det handler om at man vil have noget at fortælle videre. for man kommer jo ikke selv med noget med et reelt indhold. det er så vigtigt for nogle mennesker at alle ved hvad de laver: “se mig! jeg gør så mange spændende ting. jeg er så speciel og interessant. se hvad jeg lige har gjort.”<br />
<br />
jeg bruger selv twitter som en mental brækspand nogle gange. og at der er nogen der syntes at det jeg skriver er pladder-filosofisk vrøvl, simpsons citater og mærkelige digte og ordspil, har jeg kun forståelse for. men problemet er ikke større end at man kan klikke “unflollow” og så er problemet løst. jeg skriver så heller ikke til folk: “hvorfor følger du mig ikke mere?”<br />
<br />
jeg syntes da selv at der er mange spændende ting ved mig men det er ikke interessant for alle. at jeg hygger med computeren, metal-guitar og min ’isme betyder ikke at resten af verden syntes det er så frygteligt spændende at de må vide alt. jeg føler i hvert tilfælde ikke at det er så vedkommende at alle skal vide at nu har jeg lært en ny skala. og helt ærligt, hvad skal man tale om når man så er sammen?<br />
<br />
hvor den sygelige trang at andre skal tvinges til at deltage i ens helt almindelige dagligdag kommer fra skal jeg nok afholde mig fra at kommentere, men jeg tænker mit. jeg forlanger ikke at alle skal stoppe med den overdrevne brug af overfladisk kommunikation. jeg beder bare om at jeg ikke skal være en del af det. hvorfor kan man ikke få lov til at vælge fra?<br />
<br />
*** løsningen er: en mobil med flytilstand der kun slåes fra når man bruger den ;-)Miss Helenehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17048419673729977248noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7732303893218146955.post-8096578591931763652015-11-01T00:54:00.000+01:002015-11-01T00:54:07.154+01:00internet and operative system security and anonymity for the paranoiddo you feel someones got to you on your computer? do you suspect a keylogger or some other form of surveillance tool disturbing your privacy?<br />
<br />
first you need an installer image of your favourite os. install that and all the apps and tools you need on a usb stick (you can get them with enough capacity today), a sd card or portable harddrive with builtin powersupply (the smaller ones don't take up more space than a package of cigarettes) and always take it with you whereever you go!<br />
<br />
the latter is mandatory because if your are under monitoring from some goverment agency they can easily conceal a camera in your home and get your pw's that way. i read that Snowden entered his pw's under the cover of a blanket so it's not that far fetched.<br />
<br />
if you live alone like me have several computers and have one of them running multiple services on virtual machines to ensure that some traffic is generated at arbitrary times.<br />
<br />
then you need a good vpn. set your router, not the individual machines (physical or virtual) to use that vpn. don't worry! you can always have your prefered workmachine use a proxy so that you get an ip that matches your country.Miss Helenehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17048419673729977248noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7732303893218146955.post-33111088319119303982015-09-29T15:45:00.001+02:002015-09-30T14:34:51.024+02:00message to the dumb bastards in the goat fucker caliphatdo you really think i fall for something that naive? do you think i'm that desperate? come on! a mildly anatchistic middleaged british woman (could be interrested) dressing up like a fuckin' jawa from Star Wars!<div><br></div><div>i'm a tranny! i'm a guy who occationally dress up as a woman! and i like it! you throw people like me out from high places.</div><div><br></div><div>i may not be happy with the way things are done where i live now but at least i have the freedom to say and the opputunity to change things... to some extent.</div><div><br></div><div>did you really think i would participate in taking your hackers to the next level... even cyberwar?</div><div><br></div><div>do you think you will recruit any decent hacker by using an 80'ties punk rocker - that never were that good in the first place - as a posterwoman. i think you are getting desperate - really desperate. you want cyberwar... i'll fuckin' give it to you. try to get a network up and running. you will be found. you will be eradicated with digital fire.</div><div><br></div><div>you want my tactics? my skills? you ain't seen nothing yet. maybe i should offer my services to the nato cyber command and fuck you over bigtime. the Russians don't need my help in doing this.</div><div><br></div><div>this is what i propose <span style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue Light', HelveticaNeue-Light, helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">take control of daesh accounts on social media and spam their followers with messages like:</span></div><div>- we're having great fun. bombs are dropping like rain and we're getting mutilated.</div><div>- you really die of smoking in our caliphate.</div><div>- i'm an old hag and the men would rather fuck a goat than me.</div><div>- my freedom is limited. can only walk the streets accompanied by my husband who is dead.</div><div><br></div><div>you get the picture.</div><div><br></div><div>fuck daesh and their medieval caliphate.</div><div><br></div><div>'nuff said, cheers</div><div><br></div><div>Helene</div><div><br></div><div>here's the link <a href="http://www.techworm.net/2015/09/the-punk-rocker-widow-from-uk-who-wants-to-run-isis-hackers.html" style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue Light', HelveticaNeue-Light, helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">http://www.techworm.net/2015/09/the-punk-rocker-widow-from-uk-who-wants-to-run-isis-hackers.html</a></div>Miss Helenehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17048419673729977248noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7732303893218146955.post-78595272955685194102015-09-15T23:40:00.001+02:002015-09-15T23:40:38.373+02:00cyberunit - building an effective one<span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">these are my thoughts (so far) on how to create an effective cyber-unit or hacker group:<br><br>*****************<br>*** cyberunit ***<br>*****************<br><br>authorities versus specialists<br>==============================<br><br>an authority has expert level knowledge on a specific topic, this can be but not limited to php, mysql, zap and so on.<br>a specialist is able to utilize any technique as a weapon (ie. for military use)<br><br>the authority-people handles long term strategy whereas the specialist people takes care of the tactical situations that may arise. <br><br>overview of the unit<br>====================<br><br>to know who is best suited to a specific task record information on who has most knowledge of different areas, like php, zap, shell-scripts, etc.<br>who has the best skills (ie hands-on) with specific software.<br>what area would the member best like to strengthen and what agitates them doing.<br><br>tactical layer<br>==============<br><br>handles mission planning since this is recon, attack, recon, attack and so on they decide best path to cut down time consumed on decision making.<br><br>strategic layer<br>===============<br><br>handles long term campaigns, choosing overall targets and choosing which areas - new techniques, example - internal knowledge that should receive focus.<br><br>wolfpack tactic<br>===============<br><br>this should make the basis for an unit that employs wolfpack tactics. it is so easy (with shared info on shared "hack"-servers) to add new personnel to an ongoing mission. and since everyone is making their own decisions within mission paramaters this is a very effeective method of organization. furthermore one can always re-assign unit members so that the strongest unit is presented for each "project".<br>every single member of the wolfpack knows the other members strengths and weaknesses. this tactic utilizes the way wolfpacks hunt.<br><br>shark tactic<br>============<br><br>get the target to focus attention on a single point and then attack (more or less) at random imitating a group of sharks floating by and each ripping a piece out of the target.<br><br>burst-fire hacking<br>==================<br><br>using the terminal can be tedious (you have to type a lot) so use scripts, aliases, functions and environment variables. also use tabs to seperate different tasks. it's easier to remember TARGET_IP_PRIMARY and TARGET_IP_SECONDARY than which ip is which target.<br><br>tools of the trade<br>==================<br><br>the computer is the gun and software the little pieces of ammunition you load it with. the os is more like a toolbox. a "hack"-server is a good idea to have running. it runs the software utilized by the unit and one connects to the servers and use port#'s to select the piece of program used.<br><br>old school techniques<br>=====================<br><br>you don't need a classy piece of software to send an email from everyone to everyone (you need access to the targets inbox to read any reply) just a smtp-gate and telnet.</span><div><span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);"><br></span></div><div><span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">it is paramount that info on techniques and related knowledge is shared widely and freely within the group to make everyone stronger.</span></div>Miss Helenehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17048419673729977248noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7732303893218146955.post-85994820594801812382015-02-27T08:22:00.002+01:002015-02-27T08:22:41.456+01:00hivemindHow the internet was born. Chaos at work. Man’s first God was fire. But it was not enough that our tribe had fire. No, we had to take our neighbors fire too or destroy it. Seriously. Haven’t we evolved past that. I mean 150.000 years have passed and it’s just the same.<br />
<br />
How it escaped from the nerds to the masses. When the Amiga came anybody could get that arcade feeling at home. When the internet became widely available an explosion hit our world. One that will echo through history. A global communications and information network was born. Now it’s a vast ever growing, ever changing virtual entity comprised of all human knowledge.<br />
<br />
How we all created it. Everyone laid their bricks or brick. No matter the size of the contribution it still enriched the world wide web. And the internet is fueled by information flowing freely.<br />
<br />
A very vice man once said: “Information wants to be free!”<br />
<br />
Today I shout: “Information must be free!”<br />
<br />
It solves problems. Not just communication or distribution of media. But truth – dictators do have a harder time manipulating and controlling people. Excessive monitoring is a problem though. We get to that later.<br />
<br />
“In a world where information is the most priced possession any hacker is a god.” No. Not quite. Some are, but most are just a damned inconvenience.<br />
Good or evil – a matter of conviction. Terrorists, fascists, hackers, criminals, freedoms fighters, cyber-soldiers. Just our world reaching out to the internet. Who cares about kilobytes in a terra-byte world? Anybody with a keen eye. Do not fear those motivated by money. They rip your account and they’re done. The dangerous ones are those that are driven. Idealists. Crusaders. A good hacker is someone who creates a tool for the specific job or modify existing tools to solve the mystery in sight. That, and simplicity in design. Last but most important: “Use the source, g33k” Anyway. A hacker is traditionally perceived as someone who has an urge to learn everything there is to learn about computer-networks. Some may be. I don’t know. Me, I’m not. I am an uncompromising manipulating predator relying on stealth and deception. I do it, well, because I can. And it’s about the only thing I’m really good at. And I’m not super good at that either. I just love to create chaos and disorder. Disassemble the walls of society. Stick it to the world.<br />
<br />
Piracy. The end of entertainment. No. There has been piracy from the second it was possible to duplicate someone else work. The tape recorder did not become the death of musicians or record companies. The VCR did not bring the fall of Hollywood. When tv became widely available doom prophets claimed it would kill the radio. Apparently it didn’t. But in reality if I take my acoustic guitar and start jamming in public. I’m just rockin’ out hard with “Hell bent for leather”. But if I did not get a written permission to do so I have become a criminal. Piracy do harm the industry but it has always been there. I have become more of a customer over the years due to better income and not always being at the front row of a concert. And I can download right now. Today I usually check out an “internet edition” and the ones I keep I mostly end up buying. Movies, I have a lot. But most of my collection are series from the 80’es and 90’es. And all the new ones I have seen in a cinema. And there is only one way to download most of what I like. Last one downloaded was “Shogun” from 1980. Last “larger” expense was “Diablo 3”. What a rip-off! Blizzard, that was not nice. But to be fair, I did wait from like 2007 for this game so no matter what it could not meet my expectations. Actually. All the things I have done in my life, the things in which I take great pride were never my own. I did not invent a single thing. I merely adapted others work to fit my world. But I did create an alternative. I broadened our world in a very small manner. And I think that that is humans defining attribute. That ability has lead us to this very moment. And it will long after we are gone and all this is but nothing in eternity. Why monopolize it?<br />
<br />
If patents had been around when the first shovel came to existence 1 person would sit in a hole protecting the tool and anybody else would look for the functionality of a shovel just as long as it doesn’t appear to be one.<br />
<br />
Social media. the newest product? But if we think we are the customer we are wrong. We produce the product. All those intimate details we share, that is the product. You can’t force someone to shut up and you can’t force someone to listen. But that, we all share. That’s the true value of the internet. Here we meet as equals because we meet on the same basis. Same opportunities. It’s quite simple. We deserve equal rights and opportunities. But we are not equal as in a mathematical equation. Some are strong. Some are not. Some are smart. Some are not. Some are hot. Some are not. Some are women. Some are not. Some are men. Some are not. We are not the same. We just have similar designs. We are like a trillion different versions of the same old buggy code.<br />
<br />
Innovation? If the only new thing about it is in the form of we haven’t seen you in that dress before, then, who cares. If it has no real value but that of being only for a select few why even care. Does it concern me. No. It does not! So why the fuck do I have to read about it in adds? And they can bill me for my dreams.<br />
<br />
Networking. The next big religion. Well. I know God or any God is not in the computer. But the teachings of any religion is very much present on the internet. People connect, share across borders, politics, religion, sex. Here we find understanding, tolerance and acceptance. Groups show you that you are not alone. You are not the only one struck by a terrible curse or having brilliant ideas. You are just a human. No more no less. We perceive the world through the internet. I prefer the written word. I like to construct sentences and see meaning come to life. Also because I have ADHD I can be pretty fired-up about something and that kills the meaning of what I want to say. It’s like counting the bullets from a stuck Gatling-gun.<br />
<br />
Commercialization. Assimilation is not integration. Why do we choose the internet over tv as entertainment? Because it is real? Until money becomes the issue? Will it suffer the same fate as cinema, radio, tv? Ending up another pass-time experience? No it won’t. The underground is present on the internet and will always be so. It’s all about alternatives and if you are the only option it’s not really freedom of choice, is it? There will always be some tech-anarchist saying: we don’t want to be a part of that. And some of these people would rather give away their most brilliant ideas for free to benefit the masses. Not just some corporate board members pockets. But these people won’t run adds on prime time tv. You have to look for it. There’s freedom of choice for you. Free means it’s there. It’s available. It’s just not something you’ll find in stores. All human information is there. And it should be. And it should be widely available.<br />
<br />
Excessive monitoring and logging. The death of the internet? No, I do not believe that. There will always be ways to hide your identity and traffic. I don’t think we should worry about all that information the governments and intelligence services of the world has stored and analysed. At least we shouldn’t fear what it could be abused for. Science fiction does that job very well. We should worry what it is actually used for. Because every time the subject comes up those with knowledge of what is happening say: “I can’t go into that.” Or they simply say nothing. I think it’s funny that when someone mentions the idea of investigating, say the financial sector, the medical sector, whatever, these sectors always come back with an answer saying we’ve already looked into it, there’s nothing to raise an eyebrow over. But when the talk falls on vpns, encryption, darknets, the like my defense is mandatory all of a sudden. And I say: yeah, I use encrypted connections. I even try to push my non-geekie friends to at least encrypt their mails and use a proxy when getting not-supposed-to-be-free stuff. So, yeah. It’s only the true innocent who doesn’t have a problem with somebody looking over their shoulder. Innocence is something we grow out off. Sadly.<br />
<br />
CyberWar? Well. We do know a lot about methods, strategies, software because this is a very public war. We are all wired into the battlefield. We see the results all over the world. Only one way not to get fucked hard in the a-hole: be open of your methods and tools. Don’t reveal specific details. But always bare in mind that everything that must not get out in the open always end up being out in the open and then it is just to late to deny or cover it up. Damage done. Your opponent dealt you a devastating blow. In reality CyberWar is won or lost by the support of your people. When you loose your way and start thinking inwards for protection your own people become the enemy and then you have lost all. But really: This is one of those things I personally think should be considered one of life’s great lessons: “If it’s on a computer, eventually, it will get loose.” You want privacy and safety? Two words “Go offline”. But with the public very much aware the pursuit of pre-empetive retaliation is not worth the thinking. As stated earlier it’s a public war. And if you are righteous – on the side of good – you must put great distance between you and your foe. You can’t say we are the good guys and then do something far worse than your opponent. Lie! Deny your people the truth. Feed them shit that keep them aggravated against some unseen force. If you become the very same thing you wowed to destroy you have lost. Personally I would love to go back to ancient times in questions of war. When armies met on some distant battlefield. When generals lead the battle on the field. Then politicians could have their profitable wars. And those who would could seek out honor and fame. And the rest of us would just have peace.<br />
<br />
Threats lurking: big data – and by big we are talking beyond comprehension, we’re talking more drives than I can fit in my shoe closet. Backup is not possible for these systems. The amounts of data are too large. The complexity to vast. And there is not a source-tree that get you back all that data stockpiling over the years. And data is money. I mean erasing it would accomplish nothing more than aggravating ones peers. But to manipulate it that is the key. Example: I don’t like my bank. I write a virus (actually a dbms-trigger) that alters updates in the database so that at a glance everything checks out but when the annual books are reviewed all hell is loose. Not good for a bank to deliver the annual report with notes. It could be a good tactic to annoy intelligence services data retention too. Poison13 would be a good name, I think.<br />
<br />
cloud-computing: all your personal info in the hands of a private cut-throat corp. nice. i don't mind that some company knows what i'm buying for dinner because i use an reminder on a cell. but when they start to harvest that data to sell to add-companies to spam me i think it's too much.<br />
<br />
Always near. With tablets killing off the remnants of the old way of thinking computers you have your board with you. When you get home it connects to your wireless keyboard, tv or tvs, stereo or whatever. I don’t know about you but I can’t wait! Wireless audio and no fans or static chip-noise to make the slightest impact on the sound… Not that I would actually be able to hear it since I mostly play Metal on a Marshall 100w tube-amp on 11.<br />
<br />
But how did it all start for me? Well, it started when I fell in love with computer games. I had this urge to cheat so I learned assembler, debuggers. My first steps as a hacker was taken.<br />
<br />
But I think that future generations will see themselves as inhabitants of a planet due the nature of the Internet. I think world-parties will arise. It already have with “Pirate Party”. Maybe one day we will begin to see ourselves as unique individuals in a collective with our slogan being:<br />
<br />
one planet<br />
one world<br />
one people<br />
<br />
“Don’t explain the logic. Share the dream, your vision. Let me discover it’s wisdom on my own. That’s where the magic’s at. In comparison, the rest is merely tedious details.”<br />
<br />
I got the inspiration for this book partly by the media sector’s – lead by record- and movie- companies – relentless efforts to control how we use media. Also Al-Jazeera’s “Controlling the web” gave some inspiration. So did videos and tweets posted by individuals and groups. They be commentators for tech magazines. They be hacktivists.<br />
<br />
I won’t make any links or references to anything. If you disagree or don’t believe me look it up yourself. Don’t rely on my word or my sources. Find your own. That is what the Internet is there for.<br />
<br />
This is not a hint. This is an open comment on the affairs of the world today. It is my way of saying that I am tired of politicians caring more for corporate profit than the rights of the people they serve.<br />
<br />
Any actual or insinuated name references or reference to any one person, group of persons or any brand is purely intentional and deliberate. so if you don’t like me calling you greedy, self-righteous (like me), ignorant, whining (again like me) or arrogant… Well, we are. And we’re dicks!<br />
<br />
If this pisses you off write a book. I did…<br />
<br />
*** and by "book" i mean a written text larger than one page :-)Miss Helenehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17048419673729977248noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7732303893218146955.post-87039788517096799792015-01-03T10:14:00.005+01:002015-01-03T19:07:08.613+01:00a bit about hackingINTELLIGENCE GATHERING<br>
<br>
how find info without someone monitoring my connection getting suspicious<br>
<br>
find fast new https proxy (any other proxy is not encrypted)<br>
<br>
start a huge torrent dl. use a lot of connections. dl’ing a complete linux distro with sources should give you the time needed.<br>
and then “clean” your log-files. your isp have logs of your connections and the amount of data transferred even if using encrypted lines.<br>
<br>
bounce scans through same proxy<br>
<br>
isp will see a lot of encrypted traffic but nothing that can be identified<br>
<br>
<br>
FOOL SOMEONE SCANNING / ATTACKING ME<br>
<br>
setup router to vm<br>
<br>
multiple vm's and change between them… confuse<br>
<br>
xp + apache + ms sql<br>
red hat + tomcat + oracle<br>
7 + iis + access<br>
freebsd + apache + mysql +ftpd<br>
<br>
A proven effective tactic is to say a lot of shit so when I do spill it nobody gives a shit. Everybody will say: "Oh! More shit from him. He can't be trusted." But hard evidence always prevail.<br>
<br>
MAKE IT HARDER - CHAINED PROXY'ING<br>
<br>
Normally chained proxy'ing would require some form of influence on the proxy server's configuration.<br>
<br>
This is more like chained proxy'ing lite. But everyone looking will follow the proxy then the vpn and then they realise they wasted their time.<br>
<br>
VPN, then tunnel an encrypted free / public proxy through it<br>
<br>
always use a proxy for backup if vpn goes offline real ip is exposed. socks5 for speed https for privacy<br>
*** SOLVED: dns dropped when vpn goes offline. traffic halted<br>
<br>
******* GOOD PRACTICES<br>
<br>
NEVER EVER USE CELL FOR THIS SHIT<br>
<br>
IF TIME IS NOT IMPORTANT: REMOVE PARTITIONS ON OLD HDD AND MAKE NEW ONES, BUT MAKE IT ENCRYPTED. THE INITIAL ENCRYPTION SETUP<br>
ON THE HDD WILL OVERWRITE EVERYTHING ON THE DISK. HATE WASTING A DRIVE :-)<br>
<br>
do not store key-files (gpg etc) in keychains. install’em when needed and remove when done. at least if you are involved in<br>
something you weren’t suppose to be doing but in fact is the right thing to do.<br>
<br>
REMOVE ALL INFORMATION FROM PROXY SETUP ETC. IF I’M CAUGHT THEY STILL HAVE TO PROVE ME GUILTY<br>
<br>
primary rule of engagement: be prepared. be scared<br>
<br>
always have more than one connection available. not from the same isp but from different ones<br>
<br>
a good practice could be to make bogus posts on known hacker boards. if you can get identified hackers to say “nice one but do you actually code?” the feds will most likely label you a wannabe hacker hang-around. the important thing is that they do not see you as a threat. even though top100 could be sweet it is the downfall of any good hacker<br>
<br>
using standard language files to hide shell-code on a webserver<br>
<br>
this one is so hard. avoid temptations of provocations. especially against intelligence services. after all they are primary threat unless you fuck with organized crime syndicates as they will kill you if they find you or worse force to work for them. no matter you’re screwed<br>
<br>
watch public channels of known hacker groups. when they prepare for attack so do i. intelligence services will have their attention on ex. anonymous not me.<br>
<br>
if contact is needed create a very temporary email address like “sdhgfjksahgfiuq2ye43” or similar and delete when your done. delete every mail in every box. empty trash. THEN delete the account. in fact always use a newly-created account for anything.<br>
<br>
when done kill all log,tmp,swap as possible to give away no intel<br>
<br>
if suspecting a keylogger active use history ( !x | grep), scripts, other automation methods<br>
<br>
also to avoid logs. maybe read-only guest access with all shit on a ramdrive in system memory<br>
<br>
*** MUST TRY<br>
<br>
use squid to branch out connections. proxifier for mac works great at this<br>
<br>
example:<br>
firefox through vpn just to check target<br>
terminal through i2p as httpproxy<br>
nessus through tor as socks5<br>
safari through zap<br>
<br>
**<br>
** tried. works. just dandy :-)<br>
**<br>
<br>
this should conceal not only my identity but also my true numbers since log files will show that the attack had been coordinated and happened simultaneously from multiple locations…<br>
BURST-FIRE HACKING RULES :-)<br>
<br>
*** END MT ***<br>
<br>
maybe timer-based scripts to ensure deletion of files with possible intel of me i.e. log-files<br>
<br>
<br>
*** CREDIT CARDS ***<br>
<br>
have one card in one bank used for payments, internet buy, etc<br>
have your regular accounts in another bank. transfer money when needed<br>
that way even if your “public” card is exposed no harm they get a few dimes. fuck’em<br>
<br>
*** END CREDIT CARDS ***<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
*** encrypted drives ***<br>
<br>
i use it. internal and external. why make 2 different choices?<br>
<br>
mental note: passware claims they can decrypt any computer. well. yes if it has not been shut down.<br>
and apparently they have some difficulties with their facts. i perceive it as this:<br>
they can do a memory extraction (from system memory through firewire or by attacking the swapfile) but their<br>
example only allows for 3 or 4 gb extractions. and there are some problems with the file being to large<br>
for good old win(32-bit). 64-bit shouldn’t have this problem.<br>
but i have 16 gb of memory in my macbook pro 17” (late 2011) and virtually no swap-file (it’s always 0 mb out of 64 mb).<br>
the swapfile is the one thing on my computer not armored with mathemagics.<br>
the reason why i leave it unencrypted is that - i think, i hope, i pray - that the os won’t store “sensitive” info in the swapfile. it always take a few mb’s when it’s encrypted. i haven’t got any real proof but it’s a nice illusion.<br>
<br>
but other intel points out that you are damn stupid if you crack your cell.<br>
it opens up pandora’s shit-box of retrieving plist files with unencrypted pw’s. nice one<br>
<br>
so in fact they can’t do shit as long as one remember to shut down when the computer is not in use.<br>
<br>
also my cpu has aes-ni from intel which does the encrypting/decrypting virtually without memory lookups. off course the file has to be read from somewhere (the recovery partition). but tapping into memory is not as easy as tapping someones wifi.<br>
<br>
and people pay these idiots? extract and decrypt my hairy tits .|..<br>
<br>
ps: why pay $1000 for a piece of crap when the best in russian cyber-tech goes at half the price?<br>
<br>
*** end encrypted devices ***<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
*** encryption keys ***<br>
<br>
never send public keys using the email address they are linked to<br>
gives your mail supplier an easy way to peep<br>
and we all know how well the justice system works especially with “secret” judges<br>
<br>
*** end encryption keys ***<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
connection rules<br>
use random selection of vpn-servers. choose proxies per case.<br>
setup laptop -> i2p/tor/ka+- -> vpn (use vpn proxy settings) and use 2 different ciphers<br>
setup attack/fuzz/dynamic proxy -> tor/ka+/i2p (vpn is tunnel over these)<br>
setup system proxies to desired attack-proxy<br>
anon-net takes over when vpn ends. should take care of the honeypot issue<br>
this way anon-net knows not your vpn and vice versa. should make it near impossible to trace me. up yours, loggers!<br>
also if using a proxy for the vpn your vpn provider will not know your true ip<br>
<br>
also it is vice to have vpn not restore original network settings (dns etc) so that connection is rendered utterly useless if vpn fails. nothing out. nothing in. this is to ensure that non-encrypted traffic never leaves the computer.<br>
<br>
if having that feeling when "doing what you have to do to do be able to do what you do" better pull the internet cable. never use connects using wifi or bluetooth.<br>
it is much faster to pull the connecting cable (incl 3g/4g usb dongles) than to log out and shutdown everything.<br>
<br>
always have a powerful (mine is 750kv) stun gun to ensure data extraction will not be easy. zap all devices. tablets, cells, drives, laptops, modems, everything… oh yeah, always use fresh batteries<br>
<br>
check what ip is broadcasted from web and terminal. "curl http://checkip.dyndns.org" or "curl http://showip.net | grep check_ip". and for the sheer provocation "whois pet.dk". the only usable information you get is your own public ip so who is pet? you :-)<br>
<br>
always disable and delete logfiles on target. give them as little intel as possible<br>
<br>
when communicate always use only small letters with no classic hacker 1337-shit like "h4ck" and never overuse any punctuation ("" ok) smileys -== ..|, -\|/-<br>
<br>
furthermore to hide my true nationality use machine translations<br>
<br>
never name names always name systems or sector. but again, if it increases success rate do it as in the ad’s<br>
<br>
password policy is make them hard to remember to ensure that they are forgotten once in a while so that a new one is mandatory. just press “forgot password” every other day. hacking mail accounts is so damn easy for those pursuing that fine art.<div><br></div><div>one other thing: use scripts, functions and aliases to speed up.</div>Miss Helenehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17048419673729977248noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7732303893218146955.post-38460413150730798262015-01-03T10:14:00.001+01:002015-01-03T10:14:22.464+01:00less unsafe networksafe servers network<br />
********************<br />
<br />
*** edit: “safe” implies “less unsafe” ***<br />
<br />
every desktop machine has exactly the same software (even if not used by the user) in the same versions. cuts down 2nd-line support. and if a problem is solved on one machine it is solved on them all. example: an exploit becomes known. fix it one place and it’s fixed all over. also makes adding new machines easy as 1-2-go<br />
<br />
two “dead-man-switches”<br />
1. cuts connection to the grid (kills routers). this way key-loggers etc don’t call home<br />
2. cuts bridges to server farm. if a virus is loos on the intra protect the servers. data is vital. not desktops.<br />
<br />
this cannot be emphasized enough: there are no automatics on a secure network. none! it's always a good idea to lookup problems before installing an update.<br />
<br />
servers who needs to be accessible from outside should be isolated on their own connection. this means that all machines on the inside of the network (lan) will have their own connection. so, at least 2 connections are required. this is a public/private seperation. it may seem like overkill but it allows that the router (internet access point) on the private part can have it's dmz redirect inbound traffic to a non-existing ip. administration on the public part is done through 22h ot a webbased interface.<br />
<br />
no wi-fi allowed. no equip leaves building. none gets in (people must lock their cells in).<br />
these will very soon be the really big exploit in the very near future (it’s already happening) and the potential for a major fuck-up is ludicrous<br />
<br />
each server-function is located on ONE server each (i.e. web on one, maybe 4 * 1 dbms).<br />
only mandatory ports are open on each firewall. if a machine does not need to do dns-lookups udp/tcp53/993 etc is sealed. also fw’s should be in stealth mode not answering icmp request.<br />
if an extra measure is required use different versions of the software. every software has holes. but every version has different holes. no vm’s. if the vm is compromised, the host and every vm on it is compromised too.<br />
<br />
a public server should be made completely cut-off from the real intra. all adm, updates, etc should be made through the internet. any public facing server is a drop of guard that is not needed. it will be hacked. a web-server alone is paramount to be compromised. add an underlying dbms and all bets are off. there is none. also it could be useful for data gathering of just how clever these little sob’s have gotten. kids are getting smart these days. just for the lulz<br />
<br />
a multi-line internet connection would be nice too. the more ip’s the merrier. it still has to go through one tiny hole to get in or out<br />
<br />
oh yeah. a couple of 3g/4g connections would be apt to have in store in case of a full-scale breach. why cut totally off. cunning panic is not panic. merely vigilance<br />
<br />
** edit ***<br />
<br />
it is impossible to uphold a directive that nothing comes in contact with the outside world. any device that has left the building - unlike Elvis who’s still ghosting around somewhere - that device becomes contaminated. before going in and back out it must be cleansed. that means that any documents stored locally will not enter servers. instead one must apply cloud-tech and very heavily encrypted connections. speed is not an issue so i guess that leaves pretty much up to the imagination. i think there are some american laws that prohibits too strong encryption, i think it boils down to that they want to ensure their experts can crack it. but i don’t see any right of anybody to interfere how an organisation or a group of individuals run their private networks.<br />
<br />
have a hardware based system where the machine shuts down if the webcam is blocked<br />
<br />
nothing is done automatic on a secure network. not updates. not access (no saved passwords). not nothing. and i literally mean the void of total absence of anything remotely not caused by a human<br />
<br />
*** end edit ***<br />
<br />
*** for those wearing tin-foil hats ***<br />
<br />
do not equip the servers with conventional drives (incl sad)<br />
instead have the configured system on a dvd and boot from that<br />
all data is kept in memory or on a ram-drive<br />
if someone tries to take the servers away they sure will be disappointed. its the only way<br />
to make sure no info is »left behind«<br />
<br />
*** end edit ***<br />
<br />
*** dbms ***<br />
<br />
no pw needed to access. auth is handled by a bridge in between.<br />
open source big-data with flat structure.<br />
every field has history (done by making delete disable the field altogether and update really inserts a new line)<br />
<br />
*** end dbms ***<br />
<br />
*** encrypted dns ***<br />
<br />
i think the time has come to encrypt dns lookups<br />
<br />
*** end dns ***<br />
<br />
*** "cheap" public/private ***<br />
<br />
one could make the following setup and cut cost on the connection<br />
<br />
inet<->router<->public_server/part<-(>) [ firewall<->lan ]<br />
<br />
the public_server has 2 interfaces. one incoming and one outbound.<br />
<br />
this is not the same as using a dmz<br />
<br />
the following services could be put in such a setup:<br />
* dns<br />
* mail<br />
* web<br />
* vpn<br />
* certificate server (for homework stations if none put in private_part)<br />
<br />
the (>) means that incoming traffic on the lan is filtered with a hardened firewall<br />
example: because the mail-server is located on the public_part there is no need to send request for any mail server through to the lan<br />
<br />
this setup could also be used to put in a hardened gatekeeper that scans incoming traffic for viruses, malware and other incoming nastys.<br />
<br />
*** end "cheap" public/private ***Miss Helenehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17048419673729977248noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7732303893218146955.post-64451193211163486502014-10-15T17:13:00.001+02:002015-10-24T14:36:35.806+02:00Liberal Socialism (anarchy with a friendly face)liberal socialism - freedom and choice<br>
<br>
how to replace the wellfare-state with the growth-society? you start by recognizing that growth demands opputinity for the single indivdual. it means that the state have to ensure the corporate sectors earning possibilities. this requires that every single citizen have the means and oppotunity to educate themselves. or find their own potential and exploit it. the solution is liberal socialism.<br>
<br>
the easiest solution is to implement a citizens-pay. a minimum-amount that is required to have an acceptable lifestyle in modern society. this includes money for insurances. for example isn't it a problem if the disabled can afford the required insurances for medical care, dentist, it should even cover the nodding shrink. the amount should allow for a bit of entertainment. the system should stop paying if a certain maximum limit is reached. this allows for poor people to save up money for an education. this also makes it possible to live on a low-income job.<br>
<br>
isn't it nice to have 50.000 on your account? wouldn't it be nicer to have 50 million? you can! if you choose to use the money for beer and weed it is your problem. if you choose to take an education it is your choice. the state guarantees a life of opputunity. not luxury. that is one's own responsibility.<br>
<br>
taxation! it is unjust and unfair to put tax on property. when you have paid for your house it is yours. but does this leaves with only paychecks to tax? no. we can put a tax on the consumption of money. maybe 10% to 15% on every incoming money transfer not originating from ones own account. this means that businesses do not pay tax for internal transfers. this way we can lift taxes on peoples paychecks. limits on bonusses should be lifted and instead the bonus is taxated heavily, like 25% to 50%. this is to redistribute wealth. this should ensure that money is always circulating in the society which in turn gives a more stable economy. local merchants doesn't loose to much business in the aftershock of a financial crisis. an anticipated side-effect is a (very) low but stable growth in society generally.<br>
<br>
the voting process will be of direct democracy. this is in both the state and municipal system. the voter has to vote for a named - their choice - politician and the one with the most votes chooses position first. then the one with the second-most votes. this will make the government reflect the peoples wishes and motivate coorporation.<br>
<br>
the world of today demands quickness and agility in government. and since the people have a direct influence on the constellation of their government and parliament the government (not the municipal system) should be able to decide what international agreements the country should enter. we - the people - exchange a (very) little form of influence regarding public polls but gain a lot more individual freedom.<br>
<br>
we have a choice pertaining google, facebook, microsoft and all those i was too lazy to mention (sorry guys ;-) we do not when it comes to the dealings of our governemnt. we do not have a choice when it comes to the municipal system. if we the people should trust a government with such freedom in handling the affairs of the state at least we should be able to follow every step of every policy implemented. an open and transparent government is essential in a free world. we crave freedom and choice not corruption and greed.<br>
<br>
the state concerns itself with the long-term goals like the environment, education, healthcare, justice (police) and military branches of state. they govern by setting limits for how much polution is acceptable. what types of side-effects in medicine can be tolerated. foreign-policies and such.<br>
<br>
the municipal serves the businesses in the local community. for example: a company can ask the municipal system to arrange for extras busses for a period of time if production requires around the clock operation. if people can't get to work they can't work. judicial affairs, rights of the individual and so on is handled by members of the industry in question and ngo's with an interrest in the matter.<br>
<br>
the system should emphasize on freely agreed contracts between the industry and the consumer. here the consumer is represented by an ngo member. example: monitoring, logging, google, human rights watch. if the consumer doesn't feel violated and the company has a sustainable business plan then the politicians should not interfere. cookie laws, anyone? a judge represents the state and thereby the people and have one foremost priority: to ensure that the law is upheld. that it doesn't violate any of the limits set by the state government. it is a system that clearly seperates the state from the municipal. *** it is a system where one individual can become a member of parliament simply by getting enough votes. ***<br>
<br>
this gives for example a bank a much broader spectrum to design the product to the customer. a factory producing insect repellant have some limits imposed by the state government as to what levels of environmental protection they should satisfy but how they do so is their choice entirely. local circumstances may allow for a more lenient enterpretation of the law or a much harder. but the municipal system have a much better eagle-eyes view of the local area. and the judge ensures that a permit doesn't violate the longterm goals. this system makes it possible to bend the rules taking the local society into account.<br>
<br>
the justice system should emphasize that money doesn't mean a thing in the eyes of the law. this to counter the effect of rising unequality. financial unequality isn't nessecarily a thing of evil. if the state in coorporation with the business world ensures that poor people still can afford to exist. even take their kids to the cinema once in a while. give people the means to make a brighter tomorrow for themselves and they will. wouldn't you?<br>
<br>
the state should employ private subcontractors and these contracts should be administrated by the municipal. the demand to take the lowest offer is unhealthy for competetion because it leaves only one means of getting the contract: lowest price. the system should choose the offer they believe to be the best. anything else contradicts the spirit of freedom. and an open governance should ensure that every pro and con is known. after all! we all get to go the hospital or the school or take the bus so we'll find out what the deal was sooner or later, right?<br>
<br>
this is a society that encourages the individual to make something of itself. and moreso! presents the opputunity and means to do so. yes, it is a society that allows the individual to do steroids and get beaten up or beat someone up in a cage for a living. it is a society that tries to diminish the effects of growing unequality. it is a society wherein the disabled can afford medical insurance and health care. it is a society that allows corporations much broader freedom in securing their goals and the environment. in short a society based on the fact that every member sees themselfes as a single unique individual always membering a community. it is a society that says: rematch! there is always one more try!<br>
<br>
"my ideas are out of phase? it's anarchy with a friendly face!", anthrax [mutated]<br>
<br>
the state generates income by licitation. an example: the state offers a prison contract of 7000/month/inmate. the local municipal allows that a local prison can charge each inmate 10000/month for food and shelter. and since the state deposits 15.000 each month if you have under 100.000 it is not unfair to charge people to be in prison this way. this example leaves plenty to set aside and have a good time. there is no need for a cruel prison-system. schools could be licitated this way too. hospitals. you name it.<br>
<br>
***<br>
<br>
as you can see the state cuts expenses by outsourcing more than just the job. and people above the "poverty"-line contributes to the state and those below gets their share paid by the state which in turn pays the company.<br>
<br>
the state wants 200/child/month. one municipal wants 300/child/month totalling 500/child/month. another wants 200 totalling 400, yet another 500 for a total of 700. how to profit is up to the company. this system allows for different schools to compete not only on price but product as well. but if the state charges 10.000 and the municipal charges 100.000 no one will be able to make any money. it is a new way of looking at taxes.<br>
<br>
human rights watch and google agree that a certain way of doing things on a computer system doesn't violate privacy. a judge ensures it does not violate state law and then signs it. it is now legal for facebook to use the same technology. 2 years later a new tech emerges and amnesty sees this as a problem when used with the tech mentioned before. they raise the case with a judge. the judge sees if this is in fact basis for a new trial or... a new law and if so the two parties try to reach a settlement. if they do then this is the new law. if they don't. the department of justice must make a ruling. this ensures a more dynamic way of passing a law. a system more consistant with the world of today.<br>
<br>
a chemical plant gets a no on a specific production. a couple of years later a new method of production emerges. if this makes it safe for the environment it is easy for the company to get a license to produce the chemical. and it makes it legal for every other plant to produce the chemical using the same method.<br>
<br>
it goes for both examples - of course - if it is not in violation of someones ip, patent and such. this responsibility also falls upon the judge.<br>
<br>
and yes, this system allows for a prison with a pricetag of a million a day. the logic is that the punishment is to be confined to a limited space for fixed amount of time with specific alloted rules for contact with family and friends. it is the certain individual that is being punished for a specific crime. that is what the sentence is based on. not the amount on a bank account.<br>
<br>
*****<br>
<br>
a company gets a contract for a school. they have several. now they can negotiate a better price on books because of a larger volume.<br>
<br>
the state dictates that co2 should be minimized 2%. how is up to the individual municipal system. and in turn it is up to the single copmpany how to do so.Miss Helenehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17048419673729977248noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7732303893218146955.post-8716578554350531592014-10-05T20:51:00.001+02:002014-10-05T20:51:00.687+02:00safe servers network<p style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-wrap: break-word;"><span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">safe servers network<br>********************</span></p><p style="margin: 15px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-wrap: break-word;"><span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">*** edit: “safe” implies “less unsafe” ***</span></p><p style="margin: 15px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-wrap: break-word;"><span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">every desktop machine has exactly the same software (even if not used by the user) in the same versions. cuts down 2nd-line support. and if a problem is solved on one machine it is solved on them all. example: an exploit becomes known. fix it one place and it’s fixed all over. also makes adding new machines easy as 1-2-go</span></p><p style="margin: 15px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-wrap: break-word;"><span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">two “dead-man-switches”<br>1. cuts connection to the grid (kills routers). this way key-loggers etc don’t call home<br>2. cuts bridges to server farm. if a virus is loos on the intra protect the servers. data is vital. not desktops.</span></p><p style="margin: 15px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-wrap: break-word;"><span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">this cannot be emphasized enough: there are no automatics on a secure network. none! it's always a good idea to lookup problems before installing an update.</span></p><p style="margin: 15px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-wrap: break-word;"><span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">servers who needs to be accessible from outside should be isolated on their own connection. this means that all machines on the inside of the network (lan) will have their own connection. so, at least 2 connections are required. this is a public/private seperation. it may seem like overkill but it allows that the router (internet access point) on the private part can have it's dmz redirect inbound traffic to a non-existing ip. administration on the public part is done through 22h ot a webbased interface.</span></p><p style="margin: 15px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-wrap: break-word;"><span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">no wi-fi allowed. no equip leaves building. none gets in (people must lock their cells in).<br>these will very soon be the really big exploit in the very near future (it’s already happening) and the potential for a major fuck-up is ludicrous</span></p><p style="margin: 15px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-wrap: break-word;"><span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">each server-function is located on ONE server each (i.e. web on one, maybe 4 * 1 dbms).<br>only mandatory ports are open on each firewall. if a machine does not need to do dns-lookups udp/tcp53/993 etc is sealed. also fw’s should be in stealth mode not answering icmp request.<br>if an extra measure is required use different versions of the software. every software has holes. but every version has different holes. no vm’s. if the vm is compromised, the host and every vm on it is compromised too.</span></p><p style="margin: 15px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-wrap: break-word;"><span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">a public server should be made completely cut-off from the real intra. all adm, updates, etc should be made through the internet. any public facing server is a drop of guard that is not needed. it will be hacked. a web-server alone is paramount to be compromised. add an underlying dbms and all bets are off. there is none. also it could be useful for data gathering of just how clever these little sob’s have gotten. kids are getting smart these days. just for the lulz</span></p><p style="margin: 15px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-wrap: break-word;"><span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">a multi-line internet connection would be nice too. the more ip’s the merrier. it still has to go through one tiny hole to get in or out</span></p><p style="margin: 15px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-wrap: break-word;"><span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">oh yeah. a couple of 3g/4g connections would be apt to have in store in case of a full-scale breach. why cut totally off. cunning panic is not panic. merely vigilance</span></p><p style="margin: 15px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-wrap: break-word;"><span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">** edit ***</span></p><p style="margin: 15px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-wrap: break-word;"><span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">it is impossible to uphold a directive that nothing comes in contact with the outside world. any device that has left the building - unlike Elvis who’s still ghosting around somewhere - that device becomes contaminated. before going in and back out it must be cleansed. that means that any documents stored locally will not enter servers. instead one must apply cloud-tech and very heavily encrypted connections. speed is not an issue so i guess that leaves pretty much up to the imagination. i think there are some american laws that prohibits too strong encryption, i think it boils down to that they want to ensure their experts can crack it. but i don’t see any right of anybody to interfere how an organisation or a group of individuals run their private networks.</span></p><p style="margin: 15px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-wrap: break-word;"><span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">have a hardware based system where the machine shuts down if the webcam is blocked</span></p><p style="margin: 15px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-wrap: break-word;"><span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">nothing is done automatic on a secure network. not updates. not access (no saved passwords). not nothing. and i literally mean the void of total absence of anything remotely not caused by a human</span></p><p style="margin: 15px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-wrap: break-word;"><span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">*** end edit ***</span></p><p style="margin: 15px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-wrap: break-word;"><span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">*** for those wearing tin-foil hats ***</span></p><p style="margin: 15px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-wrap: break-word;"><span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">do not equip the servers with conventional drives (incl sad)<br>instead have the configured system on a dvd and boot from that<br>all data is kept in memory or on a ram-drive<br>if someone tries to take the servers away they sure will be disappointed. its the only way<br>to make sure no info is »left behind«</span></p><p style="margin: 15px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-wrap: break-word;"><span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">*** end edit ***</span></p><p style="margin: 15px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-wrap: break-word;"><span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">*** dbms ***</span></p><p style="margin: 15px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-wrap: break-word;"><span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">no pw needed to access. auth is handled by a bridge in between.<br>open source big-data with flat structure.<br>every field has history (done by making delete disable the field altogether and update really inserts a new line)</span></p><p style="margin: 15px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-wrap: break-word;"><span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">*** end dbms ***</span></p><p style="margin: 15px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-wrap: break-word;"><span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">*** encrypted dns ***</span></p><p style="margin: 15px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-wrap: break-word;"><span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">i think the time has come to encrypt dns lookups</span></p><p style="margin: 15px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; word-wrap: break-word;"><span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">*** end dns ***</span></p>Miss Helenehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17048419673729977248noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7732303893218146955.post-27631517478288097082014-09-03T11:28:00.002+02:002014-11-10T17:10:34.651+01:00Black Holes and the beginning of the Universedet starter med sorte huller. de suger alt ind. tiltrækningskraften er så stærk at selv ikke lys undslipper. Det tryk der er i et sort hul bevirker at alt trykkes sammen og derved rykkes i stykker. Det ender med at have en masse så tæt på 0 at det reelt ikke fylder noget. På et tidspunk er der så meget “ingenting” i et sort hul at trykket i det sorte hul presser ingenting sammen til noget. Der opstår objekter med masse. Med struktur og mønstre. Og når der er for meget masse i det sorte hul at tingene ikke kan rives i stykker og derved optages i det sorte hul sker der en ukontrolleret energi udladning. Og vi har et Big Bang. Der har ikke kun været et men multiple simultane Big Bangs.<br>
<br>
Dette åbner så et meget interesant spørgsmål: har sorte huller indbyrdes forbindelse gennem et eller andet uset sub-rum? for hvordan koordineres sådan en hændelse? og hvis det er sandt er sorte huller så en genvej til universets center? Alt har en cyclus. Alt. Også universet.<br>
<br>
hvis man forestiller sig massen af et helt univers presset sammen til en enkelt singularitet der sætter en ukontrolleret kædereaktion i gang. eller har sorte huller en kritisk masse. jeg siger de har. den energi dette blast må medføre vil have så stor kraft at det kan skabe en lignende reaktion i det eller de nærmeste sorte hul(ler). og så fremdeles.<br>
<br>
det forklarer hvorfor det big bang kan høres overalt i universet. det forklarer hvorfor universet tilsyneladende udvidede sig med den hastighed det må have gjort for at opnå den størrelse det har i dag. Det forklarer også hvorfor universet udvider sig i alle retninger. Og det er den eneste forklaring på at man aldrig har tilnærmet sig et epicenter for the big bang.<br>
<br>
og det medfører at universet i virkeligheden også har en livscyclus hvor det hele starter med at sorte huller suger alt ind. ændrer det og spytter et nyt univers ud.<br>
<br>
så da einstein sagde at gud ikke kaster med terninger tog han fejl. de sorte huller er guderne's eller gud's tilfældigheds-generator. det stemmer også godt overens i naturen hvor man ser den samme skabelon gå igen men på en ny måde hver gang. se bare på zebraer. der er ikke to ens men alligevel kan man ikke se forskel.<br>
<br>
man kan ikke forestille sig hvilken stråling der måtte opstå men kan det antages at "grund-byggestene" udsat for den rette stråling kan have været det der skabte de absolut første former for liv? jeg ved ikke, men hvis ikke livets gnist er en form for gud-dommelig kraft så ved jeg ikke hvad der kan kaldes gud-dommeligt.<br>
<br>jeg hælder mere og mere til at et sort hul presser matriale til mørkt stof. tilstanden mellem energi og masse. når et sort hul opnår kritisk masse skaber eksplosionen higgs partiklen. der så igen danner mønstre - altså partikler. - når den går i forbindelse med mørkt stof. <br>
<br>
*** here's my english translation<br>
<br>
it all starts with black holes. they suck in everything. the gravitational force is so strong that not even light can escape its grasp. the pressure in a black hole will grind and rip aprt everything within so that it is broken into the very simplest of elements. in reality "stuff" ends up with a mass close to 0 which in turn means that is takes up nearly no space. at a certain point one could argue that the pressure forces all this nothing into something. objects comes into existance (we can duplicate this effect with a tube amplifier that works by manipulating the electrons that spontanious occur in the vacuum of the tube) attaining mass. tructures and patterns follows. and when there is too much mass in a black hole that its force cannot "absorb" more matter an uncontrolled energy emession takes place. that is a big bang. not the. i believe there has been multiple.<br>
<br>
this opens up a key question: does black holes have some unseen connection through a non discovered sub-space? because how can such an event as the big bang be coordinated? and if true is black holes some shortcut to the center of the universe? everything have a cycle. even the universe.<br>
<br>
if one imagine the mass of an entire solar-system compressed into a single singularity and an uncontrolled burst of energy occurs. what i argue is that black holes have a critical mass. i say yes. can this blast have enough power to make a similar effect in the nearest black holes occur. again i say yes. this happenened throughout the universe.<br>
<br>
this explains why the big bang is heard throughout the universe. it explains why the universe achieved the size is has in the amount of time it used to do so. it explains why the universe is expanding in all directions. and it is the only explanation to why we haven't zeor'ed in on an epi-center for the big bang.<br>
<br>
and it implies that the universe has a life-cycle where it all starts (and ends) with black holes absorbing everything. change it and spit out a new universe.<br>
<br>
when einstein said that God dfo not throw dice he made a mistake. black holes are our Gods or God's random-generator. it is also consistent with nature where one can study the same template being used over and over with variated results. take zebras. not 2 are alike but one can't diffentiate between them.<br>
<br>
i don't think one can speculate on the type of radiation this would create but i think one can assume that the radiation combined with the building blocks of the universe could have created the first simplest forms of life. micro-organisms.<br>
<br>
if the spark of life is not some form of divine power i do not know what could be called divine.<br><br>
the "grinding process" i think produce what is called dark matter. the state between energy and mass. when a black hole reaches critical mass the explosion creates the higgs particle which in turn interacts with the dark matter to form patterns - here particles and atoms. that could explain why it requires so much energy to make the higgs particle and why dark matter is scattered throughout the universe. Miss Helenehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17048419673729977248noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7732303893218146955.post-21463157596843228802012-10-20T12:46:00.001+02:002012-10-20T12:46:40.536+02:00The Europa Parliament, Greece and the crisis<p>In 1999 Greece was denied membership of the €-zone. Their economy was way of the scale. I mean, taxes? Not a word in Greek, apparently :-)</p>
<p>They were accepted in 2001 though. Something fishy happened. Com on, did the politicians and civil servants in the EU beuracracy truly believe that Greece had fixed their economy in 2 years?</p>
<p>They should have taken steps to help Greek with its financial situation in 1999 instead of doing them an il-concieved favour in 2001.</p>
<p>I think they accepted Greece to put some pressure on countries that did not support the €.</p>
<p>Our world leaders have had knowledge of just how bad the situation was and did nothing. Nothing, indeed :-(</p>Miss Helenehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17048419673729977248noreply@blogger.com0